From dev-return-18816-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@nifi.apache.org Wed Feb 20 15:54:18 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 330E918075F for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 16:54:18 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 6921 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2019 15:54:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@nifi.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@nifi.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@nifi.apache.org Received: (qmail 6886 invoked by uid 99); 20 Feb 2019 15:54:11 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 15:54:11 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 3674BC1BB2 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 15:54:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.798 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.798 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9MZKdoAZB3wl for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 15:54:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vk1-f172.google.com (mail-vk1-f172.google.com [209.85.221.172]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id E49EF5F6C0 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 15:45:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vk1-f172.google.com with SMTP id x140so5592532vke.5 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 07:45:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Yr8VfDcyVfosRlPM64Pwfht3bkfe/zjLAQIZVlNg0o8=; b=B+a1ML01TjA/almoUePnF/xDJfF8anItGPdSIQUZUgyQ6TpIY52esRI7bNnkKiSPdB +iBysAvsP6mnRRH8+SAAoCbYGx90gGnwe2J9pQOo6AdzUWhd8v3AFkV2hoK/z8E2fUfN p7Amj1OuyVfKRxoq5JqmN0LaaPTxwqd6XFjnIcyS33RQMcH9KmadkwSMfP/16bV40R1Q WPS+YxdgOwWY0fnVriSmMeFxokPmf1mbrQ4+ojwhYO2sPEVWuSSuU7gBqPkCe9kD+UWi t1HaIhmvQufnljwlsDAfV8dR/cONg2YzbDAhSElu1WPeG/ihFCtFQEXrhYQaokMdCmiH WRZQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=Yr8VfDcyVfosRlPM64Pwfht3bkfe/zjLAQIZVlNg0o8=; b=bkbh8uQYoeXCT6tgXMQZsZepz19+vjH1OQBQmbdVtrWhv+nS+JZgFamHYcRxxfdfjB of89kODIShnuKeoGynOPE81Ee8hbQpUalxkQQPFwtr0i4CJXwWRCQK17k/J+R6ZGoxoE px06Rnei/hUeCj2Jvg0vhg8ALB9J8Ff/c/K06jvwyz56J8MYR8ZMN2PONYCcGuA0usvX /LGOAe5giSF+/ghXloxgBy6HKgP66A3KvbNx2Bsz5NGxe6q4ngoONobw7eTBixgtnoYU cIuJgdzJvUcojK8I/vkKIGF5BTCgAZpiUeI3wsGnYUeiZYJTeYM8dC3oPG+MgkpN8fG4 Av7A== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuaxdnfcZYS4mAASm5KJ9vn5O5Sx6v5wdE3Dp1WKMV6F3fEAJifG /RCx5JSrfNR3yVeVQjgggBR3uuBXG3jJ3JQsKkFFBA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IZXia6WvOCaXwx0f8USNHeIfB7oYmZSGK6CEf73DzNhVYEI6z/EHzzMH/iWX3A/EKlNy65iVZ+iCxWayi6diOY= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:fc0e:: with SMTP id a14mr18869151vki.91.1550677510610; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 07:45:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Joe Witt Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 10:44:59 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Which version to tag? To: dev@nifi.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002e622d0582553e58" --0000000000002e622d0582553e58 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I just created 1.10.0 in JIRA. thanks On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 12:41 AM Sivaprasanna wrote: > I still don=E2=80=99t see a version tag for 1.10 in Jira board. > > On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 at 10:04 AM, Joe Witt wrote: > > > ok now master is at 1.10.0-SNAPSHOT. > > > > Thanks > > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 10:37 PM Joe Witt wrote: > > > > > You are free to merge to master on approved/reviewed items as per > normal. > > > Current master is on 1.9.0-SNAPSHOT so your edit would need to be as > > well. > > > Once the RC completes (which is the case in 14 minutes at current > voting) > > > I'll update the versions on master to 1.10.0-SNAPSHOT and do the sign= ed > > tag > > > dance/etc.. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 6:35 AM Mike Thomsen > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Probably best to just hold off until the RC2 voting is done because > you > > >> might have to update it twice if it gets tagged 1.10 and 1.9RC2 fail= s. > > >> > > >> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 6:08 AM Sivaprasanna < > sivaprasanna246@gmail.com > > > > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > All, > > >> > > > >> > I have just now merged PR 3285 to master. The associated Jira is > > >> NIFI-5987 > > >> > . Now, since > Apache > > >> NiFi > > >> > 1.9.0 rc-2 is in voting, I'm confused whether to tag this particul= ar > > >> issue > > >> > with 1.9.0 version or not. I don't see the version tag for the nex= t > > one > > >> > (1.10). > > >> > > > >> > - > > >> > Sivaprasanna > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > --0000000000002e622d0582553e58--