From dev-return-18497-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@nifi.apache.org Fri Nov 16 22:15:32 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id B2C0F180670 for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 22:15:31 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 20708 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2018 21:15:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@nifi.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@nifi.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@nifi.apache.org Received: (qmail 20694 invoked by uid 99); 16 Nov 2018 21:15:29 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 21:15:29 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 8CB75C2A90 for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 21:15:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.66 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.66 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_MED=-1.459, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M2udXYc5Grk0 for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 21:15:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw1-f45.google.com (mail-yw1-f45.google.com [209.85.161.45]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 499365F35B for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 21:15:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yw1-f45.google.com with SMTP id k6-v6so10621964ywa.11 for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 13:15:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=zG5iXqmlPJWNKV1grmRan1vd1ajyIF59OpZtFF9qqQU=; b=tl9kpLLLfqQEdX2/d1Y67qJcLPOjXebBsrHwnLl1nfldYjNFGbBXwhKAKgWDnbuXzs i//ljM2k800ze0Gt98ejDi1oXR0PCuPznw9X6a0ffB6w2f+bccTmQeS9k9SmUDVdE+iN te87llInDKMxga7lZGST5ROo9YRmhbYP2eLfQsn7XkXoTPz4Ne6N/IrKdVvc9JQy0P5u n3ZcflbQsH9DCcAFTdkbazJUR7G7hnDzoAs8rcswqtBkMQDFHFuHYixNT7syeTU89NCc VRdFkFmH2AJe+ZkqMCLxV9t7Nc6ku5PlPeA+Dn6PdhcAG4RK5I8Shqdsw1kDjl9kA8z2 tIOQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=zG5iXqmlPJWNKV1grmRan1vd1ajyIF59OpZtFF9qqQU=; b=VNm89Qb0sWY+SXwpmvMYZ592PcR3is8yD453Wp8//0mSO1VqLlc7alKf91dbCNe8XO X2TwJdC66MGhATE6Do/g/ip05Dv3bDI7VYqRcGuelkKxtUDZlqJ4qBd6Ac4/x2vCV51o eM0TGXKY4foGQppyAreJtO0xH632jBfcNaaFuu4N2hxQ+6WFTP8PWX9+X0PQyslJkgSd 0M3+lwJTrRRpJ2XYRt4kfjqh3plJabAZEgO2G3wFCTHiA7TiTl7RWFt5GNXa5Klb5HVo Ch6eKeAggSuYJehjKJPXhqfwIM9YBjr1KM8BtH8C59ExthF/wLxY1NK9gM7Qp8bR3Pst HvEg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gJvQS3AHsCqjC8IQFbWZcbj06Q65NrGTQBNrJ5Qc6hyRj4OyAaS 8o91N1JWHSldLUbjgPQ47vUZ8bO1ohI02S6l9x5Wog== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5cT2A09LsyKdrvYbAHZ8oHTywbz4e0xqSm26y/4fIBEgnR+bFXpcHga/O744raVRlx6fZdPvRLWNvw3mbVgD+I= X-Received: by 2002:a81:53d6:: with SMTP id h205-v6mr11875995ywb.475.1542402922208; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 13:15:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: James Srinivasan Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 21:15:10 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Processor forwards/backwards compatibility To: dev@nifi.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mark, Gotcha, thanks very much. James On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 at 19:41, Mark Payne wrote: > > Hi James, > > The processor may or may not work with older versions of NiFi (1.x.0). But should work with > newer versions of NiFi (1.z.0). That's because there may be a feature of the nifi-api that you use > in 1.y.0 and we can guarantee that will not be removed in 1.z.0 but it did not exist in 1.x.0. > > Thanks > -Mark > > > > > On Nov 16, 2018, at 2:35 PM, James Srinivasan wrote: > > > > I've read https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/Version+Scheme+and+API+Compatibility > > but I'm still not quite clear: > > > > I develop my own custom Processor against NiFi v. 1.y.0 > > > > Should that processor work with older NiFi releases 1.x.0 (x > > > Should that processor work with newer NiFi releases 1.z.0 (y > > > Thanks > > > > James >