From dev-return-16428-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@nifi.apache.org Sat Feb 10 13:42:47 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@eu.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@eu.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D3A18061A for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 13:42:47 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id B89A6160C4D; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 12:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 095B8160C30 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 13:42:46 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 78689 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2018 12:42:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@nifi.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@nifi.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@nifi.apache.org Received: (qmail 78673 invoked by uid 99); 10 Feb 2018 12:42:45 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 12:42:45 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id D8AE718034D for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 12:42:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.879 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6fuDG323z1lc for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 12:42:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ot0-f171.google.com (mail-ot0-f171.google.com [74.125.82.171]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 96C7A5F3BA for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 12:42:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ot0-f171.google.com with SMTP id r23so10206022ote.8 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 04:42:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=SQGlMqqO2QqpyIm2jNNYsYlw6GsFGJLz2iljVrWJ4KY=; b=mn7HMSiZGBxTobV/qoeK6U5kyBptFQ45uMth8q91I+ulaHtBMn1m2sWDGnbRayhPhQ bHxw3GyRmf70A8LOdbYtBbIvJdjGpG3ldg0Phlck0yLc71u1hs3pHfvN8ZAZAt66ij5s iTk9PCTV6nphSeCUz2EI5tNR3Dc/Qk4/3P0JuxYvfLPlUHTd77DY4tMmczfQWL/JG2k+ 3Ec4gSWg/LSTZ081STvaXqVWWjpBtocV/0fxJFLSpGYDl8i9WmOdSH1yzw8OyLpUypHw g9SaCm9C3/sHvT6rQWx1hDM/c5NvxYO9uLT7/wpQw+s9M+bqqYhzJDst7FnazOCIBLhR iOug== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=SQGlMqqO2QqpyIm2jNNYsYlw6GsFGJLz2iljVrWJ4KY=; b=exUQikQvBhjbvTt9eQIPWQyQyGIVxdSHcQWBZyk3GX/NHaAwUedItU+HTolkwk/Qbx gYLdZDb/pBL5Dd7bhQezCgwqJEgsYCZxGlnClzy06DyVNQuqTCPQWK/ol0wF7LNCtwN2 S0tjuu+Hrz7PUpXNhdElc52lNYD58Xhjb/VakvPaexzjUvIWFldvquDeFKtJJgINknfl ItFk1A6OzFOmBkAEw4+IA84DWDDV10iaWGorb2Q379jze9E7e3Q8rCFaF38Pm2f4EwoW 950IUfBhD4ooxdC+sgn6zh2BcNm4xo/ok+22pqeyK2AucC0zCmTEFr/wan+tVIYub/ZG FDGw== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPDZiVZxTwkw6kK5Xr9m+lMklMx8HF0YVg4FeJjLIz4u53otrZFx aaLTRhm7lqFzibVSvNSaUqLne6ylxNO2Rbsmi+LMkQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x226N7gGjWGitEA1CatAoVM6qjJ25tabu6t7EJydWHhm6SnpiuaJ9OUzO+0r/c66Rpi/h9VUw/hSiyvIdTjeB5X4= X-Received: by 10.157.37.19 with SMTP id k19mr4790156otb.392.1518266562935; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 04:42:42 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.58.68 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 04:42:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.157.58.68 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 04:42:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Joe Witt Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 07:42:42 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Will you accept contributions in Scala? To: dev@nifi.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114033f62881720564dafb94" --001a114033f62881720564dafb94 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" i personally would be ok with it for an extension/processor provided it integrates well with the build. i would agree with andys view for core framework stuff but for extensions i think we can do it like mikethomsen suggested. others? thanks joe On Feb 10, 2018 7:30 AM, "Mike Thomsen" wrote: > I'm just a community contributor, so take that FWIW, but a compromise might > be to publish the Scala code as separate maven modules to maven central and > then submit a thoroughly tested processor written in Java. As long as you > have enough unit and integration tests to give strong coverage, I wouldn't > imagine anyone here would have issues reviewing it. If the tests fail > because of code issues in the external dependencies, the obvious answer is > to just hold the PR until the tests pass. > > On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 9:00 AM, Weiss, Adam > wrote: > > > Devs, > > > > I have some interns starting with my team and we use Scala internally for > > our work. > > If I wanted to have them work to contribute some new processors, would > > they have to be Java to be included with the base distribution or could > > they use Scala as long as it fit within your current build and test > process? > > > > Thanks, > > -Adam > > > --001a114033f62881720564dafb94--