[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFI-275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15993168#comment-15993168
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on MINIFI-275:
---------------------------------------
Github user phrocker commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/85#discussion_r114137339
--- Diff: libminifi/src/core/yaml/YamlConfiguration.cpp ---
@@ -491,14 +510,18 @@ void YamlConfiguration::parsePortYaml(YAML::Node *portNode,
YAML::Node inputPortsObj = portNode->as<YAML::Node>();
- // generate the random UIID
- uuid_generate(uuid);
-
- auto portId = inputPortsObj["id"].as<std::string>();
+ // Check for required fields
+ checkRequiredField(&inputPortsObj, "name");
auto nameStr = inputPortsObj["name"].as<std::string>();
+ checkRequiredField(&inputPortsObj, "id", "The field 'id' is required for "
+ "the port named '" + nameStr + "' in the YAML Config. If this port "
+ "is specificy an input port for a NiFi Remote Process Group, the port "
--- End diff --
typo
> Configuration without IDs for components causes exceptions
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MINIFI-275
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFI-275
> Project: Apache NiFi MiNiFi
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: C++, Processing Configuration
> Reporter: Aldrin Piri
> Assignee: Kevin Doran
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: cpp-0.2.0
>
> Attachments: config.TEST.yml
>
>
> One of the changes to how components are handled in C++ introduced a defect into the
original construct over the version 1 schema of the YAML.
> The absence of this ID causes a YAML exception.
> We should provide handling to support configurations how they were created originally,
possibly providing a default/generated ID where one isn't specified, and start laying the
foundation for versioned schemas as provided in our Java implementation.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
|