Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B318200C86 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 10:42:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 79C08160BCB; Wed, 31 May 2017 08:42:26 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id C0312160BBA for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 10:42:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 3462 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2017 08:42:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact netcat-help@netbeans.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: netcat@netbeans.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list netcat@netbeans.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 3449 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2017 08:42:24 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 May 2017 08:42:24 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 0C318180647 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 08:42:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.379 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.379 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aKZxl19WdCTL for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 08:42:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f45.google.com (mail-oi0-f45.google.com [209.85.218.45]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id BC45D5F295 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 08:42:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f45.google.com with SMTP id b204so7219031oii.1 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 01:42:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=bfg1ANCt11cPWJB5TAQ3IHBDZEfAVQxZ77mGITrV3a4=; b=DXjPR4mavDxk3lRavog7x+n5p6Eu102nKIExfq3i1im/sB/2dON0IMLVa3upufzTNR 5mSFIsF2WNXRX3CFSEASxzHhh2wIBjrU4Vk5gjby3jVGQitwysoG5F0Lz8NqeTDX0Uae rbjApB1hde4mSftk0U3W7CxID8PzDgvpx4RNB92UqgxmMJFKVElQuLGO4i6tnKYUjY9B UXGHqJBqZM3QyM/1reFtkSTDuCDNaUIrI2djoe9BpCGbNM6WcVjl0Iaogjj9HklWn+IX 2TceQVIVPQJ6HmPylj1/MVhdA2SjQjeHgWTx7xHNrbqwO9jJKA5H21duNi8VlnCElPoe MgIw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=bfg1ANCt11cPWJB5TAQ3IHBDZEfAVQxZ77mGITrV3a4=; b=htiD84l2w7QAtSUpaDVpQwBzL6Ku/0vStP0ici7S+2OQt278MLUSh9X+eIT9BJxzHt mXqdQqbXXy7OYri9X9D8NH0sldb0k2HqQ7QbOTwErPOXoJrSyBUZSQMfIaVjsQnFMwoe HT3EihjluGWyvIxDiLTSHFM88ayqfidBeO8yd0o+Jfc9znCmCam/ex3mVkAp4xx9VjyE kBbmSh0wVTi43N/M+3VfaLK5pKEi4qXfV1wa/RReB0Lu+xaj895DwxXT1wsp615PZmdn Z5VMtUcW7zjgUtuK1ObwmAbWdzA36SZDizPr1NztmO/Yp+GJ6q4wdBFzUeKqSJP691d1 u1DA== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBkm0p6lX42nKGgY0EL8iprKYDFutArFSGl0sbz4xh1XW56vnL9 q5L9Sql552+o3DKbY1SQ+k6oeLUIAw== X-Received: by 10.157.17.39 with SMTP id g36mr11841772ote.75.1496220141863; Wed, 31 May 2017 01:42:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.226.68 with HTTP; Wed, 31 May 2017 01:42:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.226.68 with HTTP; Wed, 31 May 2017 01:42:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <9247121c-bfb7-e7cd-8be5-798d863be1cb@gmail.com> From: Manikantan Narender nath Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 14:12:21 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Will we be using Synergy for this run as well? To: netcat@netbeans.incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114642e00fca000550cde6f5" archived-at: Wed, 31 May 2017 08:42:26 -0000 --001a114642e00fca000550cde6f5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable No issue at all. I was just curious. On May 31, 2017 11:48, "Ji=C5=99=C3=AD Kovalsk=C3=BD" wrote: > Hi Mani, > > yes, that's correct. > > Do you see any issue with that? > > Thanks, > -Jirka > > Dne 31.5.2017 v 08:16 Manikantan Narender Nath napsal(a): > >> Hi, >> >> For NetCat 9, will we be still using Synergy for Tribe allocated testing= ? >> >> Cheers >> >> Mani >> >> --001a114642e00fca000550cde6f5--