Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52012200C86 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 09:36:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 50B6A160BCB; Wed, 31 May 2017 07:36:44 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 96AD6160BBA for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 09:36:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 66006 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2017 07:36:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact netcat-help@netbeans.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: netcat@netbeans.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list netcat@netbeans.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 65988 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2017 07:36:40 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 May 2017 07:36:40 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id D18F2C1471 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 07:36:39 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.397 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.397 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.796, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k2ushUXMY5YL for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 07:36:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pf0-f180.google.com (mail-pf0-f180.google.com [209.85.192.180]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id F206E5F5B4 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 07:36:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pf0-f180.google.com with SMTP id 9so6564264pfj.1 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 00:36:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date:subject:message-id :references:in-reply-to:to; bh=1MeGmzIO5uShhyiW+VeE9XS1aiQOpyerNkOekEedwB4=; b=db9t6wWlWd/M4uRw1c6YNPxIWJfEIGVHh7shtKyWXGnsolfC7VGOfa3uVowdJWRztI DSnvNg7t2XJGjn7iygLMzIIZgXYkR+1lqVhrgK498NgHaK9fvbU075JCNTXJ4kSdye4y 3oVwjdzAmjhn6JFuAzcCLmQ+rEC1eqJ/O55ywtp/xv3jKMNsCx/xdI0l2k9fNRaETBKX 4SCQ6tcMKv2LN2Flt/eoi4cQ4ZhA/8dwcQusHO71AmWTVkRH1VozFwfB+jDIoUeJVRD4 akQYATtGcx3XiohxHsSwqUxualhUl2o5MCUrFaLCfCoep5niqcIHpZTsTnAl23Xa7I7o 1dRg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date :subject:message-id:references:in-reply-to:to; bh=1MeGmzIO5uShhyiW+VeE9XS1aiQOpyerNkOekEedwB4=; b=Vcl1W29pBFPeHk+QUcIiI3qFQDGg1BuZ5MHc1yjjk4CdQLBAtZAuILVJwGEC4I4a6a LJ5BQ6qNtxtHZRHQfZMQR0/37UG/e9vG677NKpmDrnqkisA/EEb4tAqTL4Twh9Hgr7Cp UupA6/U4+vXLymh0Zkm1F5pK6RRdIv9Mym8QEZc3fqejA0XKz3smSOlp5lP5cou7euNZ Qq/B5ZTGz8Y/KSnx08GGwYXPceOs1H2I7dhZeRqp8j4Kx/Xzv4MVFE4RpQTxrttSVukz XlQhYDXrFieh5k9eW9as4fK2iaDuSbbqoQKIFEu6KUe+iFlgJuOoaPZQjw+mJaB6OREb cmMA== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDosre3UjlXW/VjVcXLYtuZXF207d2YqJxrmgPlUalIo3smEB2x EyVJHFs7WGblb8rpzMk= X-Received: by 10.84.164.162 with SMTP id w31mr30452148pla.174.1496216195251; Wed, 31 May 2017 00:36:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.6.192.152] (pa49-185-251-2.pa.vic.optusnet.com.au. [49.185.251.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g86sm26206391pfe.116.2017.05.31.00.36.34 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 31 May 2017 00:36:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Brett Ryan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 17:36:31 +1000 Subject: Re: Will we be using Synergy for this run as well? Message-Id: <0453D356-24EB-44AC-80C8-8FE677AFA02A@gmail.com> References: <9247121c-bfb7-e7cd-8be5-798d863be1cb@gmail.com> <5715910C-8A53-4F79-8785-F848E2699ACA@gmail.com> <54f3690f-e8ae-90b3-cf50-5a0b684874a6@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: To: netcat@netbeans.incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (14F89) archived-at: Wed, 31 May 2017 07:36:44 -0000 It's cool. You did get things resolved last year, it's just my opinion that I= spent most of my time trying to write test cases due to those existing bein= g so far out of date they were all irrelevant rather than performing actual t= ests. I spent so much time on that that I barely had time to actually perfor= m tests. Not to complain but none of that time writing tests is actually calculated a= s part of the contribution metrics. Writing tests in the wiki format was far= faster. > On 31 May 2017, at 17:00, Ji=C5=99=C3=AD Kovalsk=C3=BD wrote: >=20 > Sorry to hear that Brett but if anything like that should happen again we m= ust resolve it quickly rather than going back to specifications in Wiki. >=20 > Fingers crossed, :) > -Jirka >=20 > Dne 31.5.2017 v 08:31 Brett Ryan napsal(a): >> Last year there was a lot of confusion surrounding which version of a tes= t case was the current one, and when test suites were setup some had the old= version. There was also some permissions problems with tribe leaders not be= ing able to allocate or edit tests, I experienced all of these issues unfort= unately. >> Personally I preferred the simple approach of editing the wiki of the old= days :) >>> On 31 May 2017, at 16:20, Ji=C5=99=C3=AD Kovalsk=C3=BD wrote: >>>=20 >>> Not sure what you mean but absolutely! :D >>>=20 >>> Dne 31.5.2017 v 08:19 Brett Ryan napsal(a): >>>> Is it less confusing than last year? ;) >>>>> On 31 May 2017, at 16:18, Ji=C5=99=C3=AD Kovalsk=C3=BD wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>> Hi Mani, >>>>>=20 >>>>> yes, that's correct. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Do you see any issue with that? >>>>>=20 >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> -Jirka >>>>>=20 >>>>> Dne 31.5.2017 v 08:16 Manikantan Narender Nath napsal(a): >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> For NetCat 9, will we be still using Synergy for Tribe allocated test= ing? >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> Mani