netbeans-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Emilian Bold <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Optional modules with GPL dependencies (was: What to include/exclude in code donation to Apache)
Date Sat, 05 Nov 2016 19:12:53 GMT
> Could nb-javac features be merged with javac, or become ide-javac within
OpenJDK, providing similar services to any IDE?

This would be pretty nice. Just like javac and Nashorn has an official Tree
API we could have an Editor API for both.


--emi

On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Neil C Smith <neilcsmith.net@googlemail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Is top-posting or inline replying the norm here?  Anyway, replies below :-)
>
> >> On Nov 5, 2016, at 12:22, Wade Chandler <wadechandler@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> I think there is “what can be at Apache; source or built artifacts” and
> “what can my platform application include in its final build; which isn’t
> at Apache; even if it uses an Apache license” and “how can Apache NetBeans
> help me package my dependencies, per my choices, regardless of Apache’s
> business and legal decisions for their own products/projects”. I think
> these are inevitably going to be part of the concerns, and perhaps some of
> yours Neil; if I’m off base, then fine.
>
> Not really ...
>
> > On 5 November 2016 at 16:45, Wade Chandler <wadechandler@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > Perhaps specific threads can be created to discuss the Java and
> JavaScript support in NetBeans (independently/maybe together). I think a
> big part of the question is what does Oracle think about supporting
> nb-javac and graal.js if they are only used by NetBeans. I mean, is there
> some long term support strategy there?
>
> This is more my concern, and reason for the questions I raised.  I
> realise my use of the words "this project" may have been open to
> misinterpretation - I meant NetBeans, not my own platform application
> (although that is obviously of tangential concern for me!).  I should
> have said, having the regular OpenJDK tooling supporting what NetBeans
> requires surely benefits all projects building similar tools.
>
> My concern is that without the Java cluster I don't believe NetBeans
> is really a viable project, and for that cluster to be viable requires
> the long term support of nb-javac that you mention.  Why I think this
> is different to reliance on almost any other library is the way javac
> uses the internals of the JRE.  eg. the last time I looked, javac had
> specific exceptions in place to bypass module restrictions in Java 9.
> It just feels like shakier ground to rely on than it could be.
>
> Assuming the answer to my licensing question is no, then I'm
> interested in exactly how much nb-javac forks from javac and how
> maintainable it is from outside?  Could nb-javac features be merged
> with javac, or become ide-javac within OpenJDK, providing similar
> services to any IDE?
>
> My 2c!
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Neil
>
> --
> Neil C Smith
> Artist & Technologist
> www.neilcsmith.net
>
> Praxis LIVE - hybrid visual IDE for creative coding - www.praxislive.org
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message