netbeans-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Gruno <>
Subject Re: Aw: Re:
Date Mon, 21 Nov 2016 10:03:29 GMT
On 11/21/2016 10:59 AM, Christian Lenz wrote:
> Hey,
> great to see the discussion about the page. The source is on bitbucket:
in a private repo.
> So I can add people as contributors or we can change the repo hoster if you want, I don't

The source _must_ be hosted at the ASF, we can set up a repository for
this now (I'll do it in a moment). Then we need to file a JIRA ticket to
have this published on netbeans.a.o.

However, there are some guidelines we have to adhere to before we get
that far, and (it MUST be clear on
the front page that this is a podling).

Anyway, I'll set up the repo now (incubator-netbeans-website.git) and
report back and then you can start pushing to that :)

> I will set a feature branch with the stuff, that I changed for
> Will do it today in the afternoon.
> It is a static page without any build processes, ok we have sass and a minification,
but for this I use netbeans, I don't have any gulp or npm script for this yet.
> Cheers
> Chris
> Gesendet: Montag, 21. November 2016 um 10:00 Uhr
> Von: "Daniel Gruno" <>
> An:
> Betreff: Re:
> On 11/21/2016 09:55 AM, Tushar Joshi wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Daniel Gruno <> wrote:
>>> You will likely also need to keep the site in two places. In subversion,
>>> you would keep the source in a source/ dir and the published content in
>>> a publish/ dir, while in git you would keep the source in the master
>>> branch and the published site in the asf-site branch.
> Just to avoid confusing people here:
> asf-site is the branch that gets published and ends up on netbeans.a.o.
> any other branch may contain the source code for the site.
>> So just like gh-pages Apache uses asf-site branch for source of site and
>> master branch for the distributable public build.
>> Is there a feature where we can use service like Travis.CI usually used by
>> Github users to build the site as soon as something is committed to
>> asf-site branch?
> Possibly, although you would think any decent site you can generate
> locally to test your changes.
>> We may also think of maintaining a develop branch for maintaining a
>> intermediate version of the site for reviews before we merge content to
>> asf-site for reviews and pull requests, as asf-site will be bound to
>> trigger a build through such a build service.
>> with regards
>> Tushar

View raw message