Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-myfaces-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A09D110422 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 23:47:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51956 invoked by uid 500); 31 Oct 2013 23:47:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-users-archive@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 51917 invoked by uid 500); 31 Oct 2013 23:47:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "MyFaces Discussion" Delivered-To: mailing list users@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 51908 invoked by uid 99); 31 Oct 2013 23:47:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 23:47:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.8 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,URIBL_GREY X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of smithh032772@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.173] (HELO mail-we0-f173.google.com) (74.125.82.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 23:47:07 +0000 Received: by mail-we0-f173.google.com with SMTP id u57so3343942wes.4 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:46:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=oZMbazECj+ueJr0iU949/uADkjlgGsjHxKo+9/Bio0s=; b=XDvUFmP9gZ3QDr1RXCa0e/lB02W+rdsbNJlaC/j0Slhtzdig8RtS1LSc6YzivtBweV VkoMKb2/dMITQ/AJgfrQyJPmN+VzuguxnWZZom1lNvVxYR9ogGjU2FvoOmBQAk85eXks svhl6mVRQcl6Ziz83nvJ7qnfT3J/xt4cDbK0C67qxkQvnM9WD0lexuREXKaF7d176Ebs ngd0ItUcBXpq2BW3Lr3XMD5eygRJaav9lBjyHLL5/aKCn7m2yTXiKT7e7EEBIfC+57oC gQMrECq2eG4rOcQENMm/gRbsFgHENHR60keeTgTbl6ayA/BmA1WfEfR8VuJ7u3h1BFt0 aI0w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.36.105 with SMTP id p9mr189092wij.2.1383263207402; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:46:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.208.7 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:46:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:46:47 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Performance params From: "Howard W. Smith, Jr." To: MyFaces Discussion Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f5035621bb2f104ea121027 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --e89a8f5035621bb2f104ea121027 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Kito, Since Leonardo answered your question, and since subject/title =3D performance params, I will go ahead and pass on performance params that are in my web.xml. See comments, and the URLs provided below as well. One of the outstanding Apache/PrimeFaces committers wrote the blog, and I am always happy to share and/or pass along. Hope it helps. When you read the context params below, you will see that I'm using high performance JUEL, OpenWebBeans, and MyFaces...of course. :) org.apache.myfaces.EXPRESSION_FACTORY de.odysseus.el.ExpressionFactoryImpl org.apache.myfaces.EL_RESOLVER_COMPARATOR org.apache.myfaces.el.unified.OpenWebBeansELResolverComparator= org.apache.myfaces.COMPRESS_STATE_IN_SESSION false org.apache.myfaces.NUMBER_OF_VIEWS_IN_SESSION 10 org.apache.myfaces.SERIALIZE_STATE_IN_SESSION false org.apache.myfaces.SUPPORT_JSP_AND_FACES_EL false javax.faces.FACELETS_REFRESH_PERIOD -1 org.apache.myfaces.CHECK_ID_PRODUCTION_MODE false org.apache.myfaces.VIEW_UNIQUE_IDS_CACHE_ENABLED true org.apache.myfaces.SAVE_STATE_WITH_VISIT_TREE_ON_PSS false org.apache.myfaces.CACHE_EL_EXPRESSIONS always On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Kito Mann wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I have a couple of questions about performance parameters: > > =B7 org.apache.myfaces.SUPPORT_JSP_AND_FACES_EL > > How significant is the performance improvement for a Facelet page if this > is turned off? > > =B7 org.apache.myfaces.VIEW_UNIQUE_IDS_CACHE_ENABLED > > If I understand this correctly, this is only useful after a specific user > has already reached the maximum number of views stored in the session, or > am I missing something? > > ___ > > Kito D. Mann | @kito99 | Author, JSF in Action > Virtua, Inc. | http://www.virtua.com | JSF/Java EE training and consultin= g > http://www.JSFCentral.com | @jsfcentral > +1 203-998-0403 > > * Listen to the Enterprise Java Newscast: > *http://w > ww.enterprisejavanews.com* > * JSFCentral Interviews Podcast: > http://www.jsfcentral.com/resources/jsfcentralpodcasts/ > * Sign up for the JSFCentral Newsletter: > http://oi.vresp.com/?fid=3Dac048d0e17 > --e89a8f5035621bb2f104ea121027--