Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-myfaces-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B359FA0D for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 16:25:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67774 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2013 16:25:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-users-archive@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 67065 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2013 16:25:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "MyFaces Discussion" Delivered-To: mailing list users@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 67054 invoked by uid 99); 1 Oct 2013 16:25:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 16:25:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of smithh032772@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.53 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.53] (HELO mail-wg0-f53.google.com) (74.125.82.53) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 16:25:19 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id x12so7116705wgg.20 for ; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 09:24:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Bmok0xbEfJig2E9kQqSDJt805Rewt9YvcNVAVxBwcAk=; b=K2rhJpvJZwoAqUOBcR1XDXIxgHwYQruiCIgZMgGhIBLXitRl0st/wT22/bFOsT/z+a pVME09293TcZwE8+JYu2Q8DyCdhpoypotKY5CNQ5jAkRpdgUsQ8C9D90E009K21C28xi LoBbkNFcQGbrHaEZxGr5vMx7StHZlpbz4Qk0n5lckzjafpZi7ywFsOeCwwQwAvPvTrgm BfXjb0GXJA1rFCZbTSQ5TrfKbdhEBm5Y3HFrwdF5m2Mg67iK/xzhGXMm2t3KiprYp5IU eU4YJ0BkiuQh2mI2TIE9os17uu4a49kRSJESMg4qAaqZnEHxxdLDzSIXIFFku0lntGaP GFWA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.93.72 with SMTP id cs8mr2640072wjb.49.1380644699055; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 09:24:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.208.7 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 09:24:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5242B823.9040001@gmail.com> <52454EEA.2060803@gmail.com> <5249EDFC.2090508@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 12:24:58 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Random JSF error: no saved view state could be found From: "Howard W. Smith, Jr." To: MyFaces Discussion Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bb04d86d92e2b04e7b064f2 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7bb04d86d92e2b04e7b064f2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 response inline/below... On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:13 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > About "it works with mojarra so that's mf" it is a big shortcut. It can be > a bug in mojarra which make it working too (im not saying it, just you dont > know and you cant conclude since you were not able to give us any info on > this issue we can use to work on it) > I agree with this. when i migrated from mojarra 2.1.7 to myfaces 2.1.8 (in late year 2012), I found out that mojarra allowed me to get away with many many things, maybe since I was junior-JSF-developer, and it gave me feeling that mojarra works well and is recommended for junior-JSF-developers because it allows your app to 'just work' regardless if your code is correct or not. definitely not calling you a junior developer, but when i migrated from mojarra to myfaces, my experience was...i had to 'fix' a bunch of my code, because my (junior-JSF-developer) code was not working with myfaces. will respond more, as i saw some things in your latest post... (my comments are directed at OP) --047d7bb04d86d92e2b04e7b064f2--