Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-myfaces-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E2C7100B2 for ; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 11:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67167 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2013 11:19:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-users-archive@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 67126 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2013 11:19:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "MyFaces Discussion" Delivered-To: mailing list users@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 67115 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2013 11:19:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 11:19:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of smithh032772@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.44 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.44] (HELO mail-wg0-f44.google.com) (74.125.82.44) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 11:19:36 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id n12so5336859wgh.11 for ; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 04:19:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=qGXXff7Df2B+7fHO0e3IWA1LngRGqP1fTukHxEswcUU=; b=xCijOYMwUzWGB2Lg2fRR9tDSPdFx9I0wYdTrg88s4hAVf6gHomNqwWw80p7UjN7HHT XeXLnVukEetny9oNFuGXzk8EY3A4rLWtDncA0JvI456Kpj2bIP2GwG5JzZ2N8VhTroNH vQdSj5bttvPbWtCEOTFIoR5LrWKDbhIRmvkw21yPPfuCl2ax4hl4WQb3a2DtqihyXfFm 8FMIrEyamfqcH+Q+gy/OCME/h7/i9h1vihnUnV0Dw9BvFap73GhUO7DDFFy+Dg3/XPnb z3lowZ8dPR80qWkxO0AN3L4T/vdJOZP1wttkNegO/qWM0LhFsQ4W1RmQp3R0a1f/pFsZ 9H2A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.20.202 with SMTP id p10mr926579wje.39.1382267955233; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 04:19:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.208.7 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 04:19:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 07:19:15 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [OT but still JSF]: Clustering, session replication, and database, too From: "Howard W. Smith, Jr." To: MyFaces Discussion Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d965774c89a04e92a563c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b5d965774c89a04e92a563c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 7:07 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. < smithh032772@gmail.com> wrote: > > hmmm, avoid database replication. > honestly, I think HA-JDBC[1] (clustering the database) is all I really need, because my app is quite fast, and only bottleneck is database layer. I have seen David Blevins or Mark Struberg say that they reverted to caching much of the data from database (in memory, on startup, I guess/assume) to improve performance, but i wonder if caching the data is really (really) necessary/recommended... [1] http://ha-jdbc.github.io/ --047d7b5d965774c89a04e92a563c--