Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-myfaces-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8247D100DE for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 20:45:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52615 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2013 20:45:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-users-archive@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 52435 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2013 20:45:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "MyFaces Discussion" Delivered-To: mailing list users@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 52427 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2013 20:45:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 20:45:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lu4242@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.51 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.51] (HELO mail-wg0-f51.google.com) (74.125.82.51) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 20:45:00 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id l18so5829344wgh.30 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 13:44:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=R7Zsx+FutYZM5tXeb8jG9/5lin+s2mNniuctK00uA5A=; b=kqC5P02lhZmP6bEPd5oDZJxBnTyUQUSieU/+gpAexx0MGyN529yd7U5hi/6mUt7sgt dHbJgP2phhiDMJ2V6MSgAFVwZmv2i5ggaD0/QihO5ACcrxsOGqLUY8/9FK8Hl7oiLFzp m9S4csRqqloE3mFrcaQQOKi0dvxtZ3en8dXxp7Af92ZE7c6T0oNxg5Fa8Il3KGFNORr5 m311spiGSAYyV1/KA9E15gaLiJf+aFy9hlUz8q33EV4zeMgZ0t84vLouYwDIbpZ6afKP 3yo20agrd3NmjTNCaOAa431ukY9EO/Yr8UCIC4WcFT3lyQ+q83xFY/N2PqMvbNiygOq8 ylIQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.98.2 with SMTP id ee2mr6301261wib.21.1382906679482; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 13:44:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.217.123.136 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 13:44:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1382857291012-116323.post@n7.nabble.com> References:

<1382857291012-116323.post@n7.nabble.com> Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 15:44:39 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: JSF 2.2 status & snapshot usage From: Leonardo Uribe To: MyFaces Discussion Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0444023e6361d804e9bf0d2e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d0444023e6361d804e9bf0d2e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi I tried the test provided with the latest snapshot of myfaces 2.2.x and with a snapshot of tomee and it is working. There is no any relationship between CDI and passthrough elements. From this fragment: Here is the output: regards, Leonardo Uribe 2013/10/27 ChrisHarris > Hi, Howard. > > I'm trying to get MyFaces 2.2's Passthrough Elements and CDI working with a > TomEE Snapshot from 2-3 days ago. When I don't use Passthrough Elements, > my > CDI bean is acknowledge. When I do use Passthrough Elements, my CDI bean > is > ignored. > > I've posted a simple web app to GitHub: > https://github.com/MungTheWicked/tomee-test.git > > Can you help me pinpoint what the problem is? > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://myfaces.10567.n7.nabble.com/JSF-2-2-status-snapshot-usage-tp115852p116323.html > Sent from the MyFaces - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > --f46d0444023e6361d804e9bf0d2e--