Return-Path: 
 <users-return-60714-apmail-myfaces-users-archive=myfaces.apache.org@myfaces.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-myfaces-users-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-users-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2FB0410B98
	for <apmail-myfaces-users-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Sat,  7 Sep 2013 04:19:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 57466 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2013 04:19:06 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-users-archive@myfaces.apache.org
Received: (qmail 57047 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2013 04:18:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:users-help@myfaces.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@myfaces.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:users@myfaces.apache.org>
List-Id: <users.myfaces.apache.org>
Reply-To: "MyFaces Discussion" <users@myfaces.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list users@myfaces.apache.org
Received: (qmail 57032 invoked by uid 99); 7 Sep 2013 04:18:55 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 Sep 2013 04:18:55 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,PLING_QUERY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ertiop93@gmail.com designates
 209.85.212.181 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.212.181] (HELO mail-wi0-f181.google.com)
 (209.85.212.181)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 Sep 2013 04:18:49 +0000
Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id c10so1633014wiw.2
        for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 21:18:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=kykajTXSyi1webXuuoDiYNcggLLm6dLA1XDngt0m6aQ=;
        b=Lil6FMDSXWmjknrfL9y/MygbnID2DcRkOagoKLAqupc7UFvcjQPAb6w9es5xUwJUri
         bMpr5FHdwmg76ThcxO65tddHsv89Dvj2RDujy0ZC+ASKzJ1WOlvcujlYeQddtEh2Goi0
         +PHDXZXHZiLvdY0H6RAE7AHQ4QcjPpOX/56gPDyCFd9s1v2XawAryF3h0puKWE2xvzqb
         9wylqBtn/kF+ks12Oy2aaZ0dV/2YFZVSVWLkog2TvnVTnj80dscq5LWmFhWkSGwLmXs7
         tj+XSs0LetovxdyR34GOuhUMCEhSRTnX439at1CCcnVzHISW1/aXgAtV71UbNhzcjAiH
         P+rg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.9.99 with SMTP id y3mr786208wia.61.1378527508958; Fri,
 06 Sep 2013 21:18:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.52.194 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 21:18:28 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2013 09:48:28 +0530
Message-ID: 
 <CADwHx2q48vuAiugd63cuyiBZDhynxehV8wtOdmJcMmTb-DDx+A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: FacesServlet.service() method eating too much time while serving
 requests (high self-time) ?!
From: Ertio Lew <ertiop93@gmail.com>
To: dev@myfaces.apache.org, MyFaces Discussion <users@myfaces.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c24d507c12b604e5c37220
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--001a11c24d507c12b604e5c37220
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I was just trying out some profiling experiments with my JSF project using
Netbeans based Profiler. However I found a very surprising results. I found
JSF's *FacesServlet.service()* method to be consuming most of the time
while requests were being served. I do serve content from databases into my
JSF pages but still I found major time lag was due to *high self time* of *
service()* method.

Here is the snapshot of the profiling results:- [image: See the high
self-time of FacesServlet service() method]

Why is this happening, what's happening so expensive within this method
that causes such high self time ?

*I am running Myfaces 2.1.12 in Production mode on Tomcat 7.0.42.*

*This question was also posted at StackOverflow
here<http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18643335/facesservlet-service-method-eating-too-much-time-while-serving-requests-high>
.*

--001a11c24d507c12b604e5c37220--