myfaces-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Questions about JSFCentral - Understanding JSF 2.0 Performance - Part 3
Date Wed, 17 Jul 2013 14:13:34 GMT
Hi Howard

JSF 2.1 is java 1.6 compatible. In this case, an improvement in the JVM
will affect all frameworks in the same way, so a change using java 7 or 8
will not affect the relative differences.

Regards,

Leonardo.
On Jul 17, 2013 1:32 PM, "Howard W. Smith, Jr." <smithh032772@gmail.com>
wrote:

> First of all, kudos for the following blog/post:
>
> JSFCentral - Understanding JSF 2.0 Performance - Part 3[1]
>
> I started reading this, and not done yet.
>
> >> Instead, it's more interesting to check the ability of a web framework
> to deal with effects like concurrency and get an idea of the overhead
> involved in using a web framework against the fastest possible solution in
> Java.
>
> So far, I'm seeing, possibly, latest releases of open source software used
> in the test...except for the JDK. Does 'fastest possible solution in Java'
> = JDK6.0.30?
>
> JDK7 has been available for quite some time and I know I'm using JDK7
> (latest version, always), and JDK8 is out there and around the corner.
>
> Is there any reason why Java = JDK6.0.30 in the tests?
>
>
> [1]
> http://www.jsfcentral.com/articles/understanding_jsf_performance_3.html
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message