myfaces-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: MyFaces ExtVal at WAS 8.0.0.4 - Call in violation of protocol
Date Mon, 08 Oct 2012 07:36:42 GMT
hi heiko,

imo it isn't an issue in extval.

you can check if both jar-files (extval-core and extval-bv-module) are
packaged correctly (in the application).

regards,
gerhard



http://www.irian.at

Your JSF/JavaEE powerhouse -
JavaEE Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces


2012/10/8 <it-media.kopp@daimler.com>

> Hello everybody,
>
> I'm currently porting an application and wanted to use MyFaces ExtVal for
> Bean Validation. Our application needs to run under WebSphere Application
> Server 8.0.0.4. I'm currently using the following maven dependency within
> the WAR project:
>
> <dependency>
>     <groupId>org.apache.myfaces.extensions.validator.validation-modules</
> groupId>
>     <artifactId>myfaces-extval-bean-validation</artifactId>
>     <version>2.0.5</version>
>     <exclusions>
>         <exclusion>
>             <artifactId>validation-api</artifactId>
>             <groupId>javax.validation</groupId>
>         </exclusion>
>     </exclusions>
> </dependency>
>
> It occured weird to me that I have to exclude the validation API but
> WebSphere seems to bring it's own which is somehow incompatible. However
> that is not the problem. When deploying the application, I get multiple
> messages of the following kind:
>
> [08.10.12 07:44:30:883 CEST] 00000008 visitor       W
> com.ibm.ws.amm.scan.util.AnnotationInfoDefaultVisitor visitAnnotation [
> com.ibm.ws.amm.scan.util.InfoVisitor@1546284787 ] for method [
> com.ibm.ws.amm.scan.util.info.impl.MethodInfoImpl@1496780783 (
>
> org.apache.myfaces.extensions.validator.beanval.annotation.BeanValidation.modelValidation
> ) ] Name [ null ] Description [
>
> Lorg/apache/myfaces/extensions/validator/beanval/annotation/ModelValidation;
> ] Call in violation of protocol
> [08.10.12 07:44:32:836 CEST] 00000008 visitor       W
> com.ibm.ws.amm.scan.util.AnnotationInfoDefaultVisitor visitAnnotation [
> com.ibm.ws.amm.scan.util.InfoVisitor@-16051367 ] for method [
> com.ibm.ws.amm.scan.util.info.impl.MethodInfoImpl@1207608866 (
>
> org.apache.myfaces.extensions.validator.beanval.annotation.BeanValidation.modelValidation
> ) ] Name [ null ] Description [
>
> Lorg/apache/myfaces/extensions/validator/beanval/annotation/ModelValidation;
> ] Call in violation of protocol
>
> The application itself works fine, as these are only warnings, BUT the
> deployment and start process of the application is heavily slowed down. It
> seems, WAS does not like something within the validation classes. I've
> tried to get some more information about what kind of 'call in validation
> of protocol' this might be, but did not find anything. Could this be a bug
> within WAS, or is something wrong here within the validation modules.
>
> It would be great if some of the developers can help. If this is a bug
> within WAS, I can open a PMR with IBM, but they obviously request some
> more information about this and I'm not quite sure what leads to this
> problem.
>
> Thank you very much,
>
> Best regards,
>
> Heiko
>
> --
> Dr.-Ing. Heiko Kopp
>
> If you are not the intended addressee, please inform us immediately that
> you have received this e-mail in error, and delete it. We thank you for
> your cooperation.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message