Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-myfaces-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A069DDB94 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 23:27:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28239 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2012 23:27:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-users-archive@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 28158 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2012 23:27:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "MyFaces Discussion" Delivered-To: mailing list users@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 28148 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2012 23:27:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 23:27:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=FSL_RCVD_USER,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gcjmu-myfaces-user@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.3 as permitted sender) Received: from [80.91.229.3] (HELO plane.gmane.org) (80.91.229.3) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 23:27:50 +0000 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Shqmb-0002Vn-Pl for users@myfaces.apache.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 01:27:25 +0200 Received: from p4fd8d19e.dip.t-dialin.net ([79.216.209.158]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 01:27:25 +0200 Received: from jschrod by p4fd8d19e.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 01:27:25 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: users@myfaces.apache.org From: Joachim Schrod Subject: Re: Trinidad is dead -- what do you use instead? Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 01:27:15 +0200 Lines: 33 Message-ID: References: <2F6FC2EB-3678-49B4-BC6C-789D76908380@gmail.com> <4FE24C9C.6050600@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p4fd8d19e.dip.t-dialin.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Firefox/12.0 SeaMonkey/2.9.1 In-Reply-To: <4FE24C9C.6050600@gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Scott O'Bryan wrote: > On 06/20/2012 03:30 PM, Joachim Schrod wrote: >> >> Since many months I use patched >> versions, and self-compiled JARs. And since I don't see that this >> will change I start to evaluate my options. No bad feelings from my >> side, really. > Thanks for the input. Which branches are you using? Tag 1.2.15 that you deleted at 2012-02-24 + some fixed bugs. TRINIDAD-2028, TRINIDAD-2047, TRINIDAD-2173. The servlet filter for TRINIDAD-119. Actually, I see now that you posted a patch to ViewHandler last year; I must have missed the email about that addition. I'm wondering if TRINIDAD-1804 is not about the same issue. No experimental patches. I haven't look at branch trinidad-1.2.x, if it's the same or what differences are there. We tried to use 2.0 before you released 2.0.1, and had too many issues with them, even though I tried to incorporate available fixes in local builds. I haven't tried 2.0.1 or trinidad-2.0.x yet. This mail thread here is one part of information gathering of mine if we shall invest the work to move our 1.2 codebase to 2.1/2.0. (We use facelets anyhow, so it shouldn't be too big an hassle.) Joachim -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Joachim Schrod, Roedermark, Germany Email: jschrod@acm.org