myfaces-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Scott O'Bryan" <darkar...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Trinidad] Concerns about the future of Trinidad
Date Fri, 04 Mar 2011 20:12:52 GMT
Yeah, makes total sense.  I mean heck, Trinidad's extendability and
plugability are second to none in that regard.

I know I, for one, would lobe to see an new/enhanced renderkit to beef up
the Trinidad system and it's been talked about several times about having a
series off "Additional" renderkits added, but nobody's actually buckled down
and done it.  ;)

If there are any takers, by all means I can provide some infrastructure for
you to do all your work.

On Mar 4, 2011, at 10:07 AM, Walter Mourão <walter.mourao@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Scott

When I first started with Trinidad, before the thing moved over to
> Apache, the AJAX was still using iframes instead of
> HttpServletRequest.  :)
>

me too!

I mean as far as Rich Renderkits go, Trinidad was one of the
> earliest.  Many other renderkits got to take advantage of newer
> technologies.
>

Yes... maybe that's the point: what about creating a new render kit using
JQuery (for example) ? Trinidad has rock solid back end and, the same way
there is a pda render kit, it could exist a JQuery render kit. Does it make
sense ?


Walter Mourão
http://waltermourao.com.br
http://arcadian.com.br
http://oriens.com.br



On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Scott O'Bryan <darkarena@gmail.com> wrote:

> Maybe.  I mean as far as Rich Renderkits go, Trinidad was one of the
> earliest.  Many other renderkits got to take advantage of newer
> technologies.
>
> When I first started with Trinidad, before the thing moved over to
> Apache, the AJAX was still using iframes instead of
> HttpServletRequest.  :)
>
> On Mar 4, 2011, at 6:24 AM, Dominik Dorn <dominik@dominikdorn.com> wrote:
>
> > It's maybe that people want fancy JQuery/Javascript components like
> > those used everywhere else
> > on the web and primefaces has those (its basically just a wrapper around
> em).
> >
> >
> > 2011/3/4 Walter Mourão <walter.mourao@gmail.com>:
> >>>
> >>> Is this because of the commercial backing of the other two?
> >>
> >>
> >> I don't think so... as far as I know there are companies offering
> Trinidad
> >> support/consulting (Irian <http://www.irian.at/trinidad_support/>, for
> >> example). Not sure about the level of commitment of these companies.
> >>
> >> Walter Mourão
> >> http://waltermourao.com.br
> >> http://arcadian.com.br
> >> http://oriens.com.br
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 9:49 AM, <ascannon01@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I've had similar concerns. until recently there hadn't been any
> apparent
> >>> movement in Trinidad development. Is this because of the commercial
> backing
> >>> of the other two?
> >>>
> >>> On Mar 4, 2011 5:53am, Walter Mourão <walter.mourao@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi folks,
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>  I'ma happy Trinidad user, so far, but I'ma bit worried about its
> future.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>  I'm seeing the evolution of Icefaces, Richfaces and (mainly)
> Primefaces
> >>>> and
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>  I feel like Trinidad isn't going with the same pace.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>  Am I right ? What do you think ?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>  Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>  Walter Mourão
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>  http://waltermourao.com.br
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>  http://arcadian.com.br
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>  http://oriens.com.br
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dominik Dorn
> > http://dominikdorn.com
> > http://twitter.com/domdorn
> >
> > Tausche Deine Lernunterlagen auf http://www.studyguru.eu !
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message