Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 29432 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2010 15:46:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Oct 2010 15:46:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 65568 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2010 15:46:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-users-archive@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 65512 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2010 15:46:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "MyFaces Discussion" Delivered-To: mailing list users@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 65504 invoked by uid 99); 23 Oct 2010 15:46:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 15:46:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of omegaobject@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.53 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.53] (HELO mail-bw0-f53.google.com) (209.85.214.53) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 15:46:15 +0000 Received: by bwz7 with SMTP id 7so2179302bwz.12 for ; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 08:45:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Q2ELz2E8qdIMMvAvf03cUv2VRE6t586/VfqurwNqmdA=; b=JBxAPW/pC69hOn9ooMLAJ4dRNQzuQfsIllll4q4SpJyRQ71TeWg0QKRp0gLNsTDkw2 MWNi6XQW2pcHNbS+N3ut1DlvXtbb97D8Qlu2dFPq0ZEVblIK1NU+NQSQ+8gWqPgY685N Lbcimw6p9xqKFK4ZJDzhRSUnksgjwkTxvI+/k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=JwR9xbDacLh8NgqIR8bu/HgSkmZyfzJx4RbkSHrMNC97+c14jv2R572D0S5Qse3EAO NG7tNd2TUMkTvDWcYxCbjMGHyLJZZqgXpkZKT2qTAH04gva5M/uU3jqHbmWymCK950KG VUIov/vqWZ+yp82qQBJZZ159YRytNfBwOU3eM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.84.76 with SMTP id i12mr3365981bkl.72.1287848754305; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 08:45:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.78.78 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 08:45:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 08:45:54 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Use of trinidad stops AJAX from working on Mojarra From: Alan To: MyFaces Discussion Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d7ef2d865c7204934aa792 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d7ef2d865c7204934aa792 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 So I have started to use trinidad 2.0.0-alpha-2 on top of my application, which uses AJAX tags all over the place. After including trinidad in the library and making the indicated web.xml and faces-config.xml changes, but without inserting any tr tags AJAX no longer works in my forms. The forms can still be processed when commandButton tags are activated, but of course I don't get the immediate user feedback when they change values or blur fields, etc. Looking at it with Chrome, the error I get is on the console is "Uncaught ReferenceError: mojarra is not defined." My guess is that the render kit for trinidad ( org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.core) is overriding or interfering with the mojarra render kit. Is this a trinidad bug or is it possible there is some step I forgot to take? Is there a bug data base for this version that I am supposed to search? Side question: is there a work-around? I'm sort of new to this group but I am willing to do the homework if I know where to look up the material. Any pointers much appreciated. Regards, A. --0016e6d7ef2d865c7204934aa792--