Mailing-List: contact users-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "MyFaces Discussion" <users@myfaces.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gerhard.petracek@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.214.181 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        b=TXIsbdPqUj6/SAHmvI+TrykSw5ivvVqHEpMnnPy6vjP61c5ueFyvaB8Pwy4bysUE87
         Z2AxDclAOmB7R88/AyY33OLZA3MAvYateRsnMpaTR97XqKECiEhhd91HR5wHi2Qklznp
         QCUx5mKr7jNyF03xJMIBjmWBVeow2zBi0zoBw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4C46E7CB.1030302@gmail.com>
References: <4C437CA3.3050702@gmail.com>
 <AANLkTin0Yq-g7B+HHyEfhBxOmOb+De4JF8E+a10xeGzH@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=vW=MXVkn=K9zX+v4tFz1jt7T6e2r5OdnP1wVo@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimhoLVBO6cLtHuaUoTX9XXygasA-AtXi-iznxMR@mail.gmail.com>
	<4C46E7CB.1030302@gmail.com>
From: Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:08:52 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=Ud=CET1mONq3o5vPLCieMKcwMq2+NkXwCys6K@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: validateBean and java.lang.InstantiationException:
	org.apache.myfaces.extensions.validator.beanval.interceptor.BeanValidatorWrapper
To: MyFaces Discussion <users@myfaces.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd254140b6b6e048be5828a

--000e0cd254140b6b6e048be5828a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

hi simon,

ok - great to hear!

yes - please file a jira issue.
(as mentioned before:
 >please file a jira issue (new feature) for the support of f:validateBean.)

regards,
gerhard

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces


2010/7/21 Simon Zambrovski <szambrovski@gmail.com>

>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Gerhard!
>
> thanks for the excellent job. The exception is gone.
>
> Should I help you to follow the community process? So should I file
> the JIRA bug for it?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Simon
>
>
> Am 19.07.2010 07:04, schrieb Gerhard Petracek:
> > i've uploaded the current snapshot to [1]. please try this new
> > version.
> >
> > regards, gerhard
> >
> > [1] http://people.apache.org/~gpetracek/myfaces/extval/snapshots/
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in
> > English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
> >
> > 2010/7/19 Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com>
> >
> >> short addition:
> >>
> >> with ExtVal 2 f:validateBean is ~supported. It's more a feature
> >> which is prepared for the next version of ExtVal. I know what's
> >> the issue here. Please file a jira issue (new feature) for the
> >> support of f:validateBean.
> >>
> >> regards, gerhard
> >>
> >>
> >> http://www.irian.at
> >>
> >> Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in
> >> English and German
> >>
> >> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >>
> >>
> >> 2010/7/19 Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> hi simon,
> >>>
> >>> by default extval doesn't use tags. so f:validateBean isn't
> >>> supported. the typesafe alternative for using group
> >>> validation,... is @BeanValidation.
> >>>
> >>> if you really need a tag, it's quite simple to impl. it. [1]
> >>> illustrates an implementation which provides all features of
> >>> @BeanValidation via a tag.
> >>>
> >>> regards, gerhard
> >>>
> >>> [1]
> >>>
>
> http://code.google.com/p/os890/source/browse/#svn/trunk/java/web/jsf/extval.bv/tag_based_extval-bv_meta-data
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> http://www.irian.at
> >>>
> >>> Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses
> >>> in English and German
> >>>
> >>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2010/7/19 Simon Zambrovski <szambrovski@gmail.com>
> >>>
> >>> Hi Folks,
> >>>>
> >>>> I observe a strange exception by that appears inside of the
> >>>> BeanValidatorWrapper in a very specific scenario. Here is how
> >>>> it goes:
> >>>>
> >>>> I use PrimeFaces 2.0.2 running on Mojarra JSF and using
> >>>> ExtVal for Bean Validation (especially to support @Valid). It
> >>>> works perfect, except for one case. If I open a popup
> >>>> (p:dialog) and use a link (p:commandButton) which submits a
> >>>> form which contains a f:validateBean tag setting a Bean
> >>>> Validation group - an exception is thrown during an attempt
> >>>> to access an non-existent default constructor in
> >>>> BeanValidatorWrapper. If I remove the f:validateBean tag,
> >>>> everything works fine, and if I use it not from the popup
> >>>> too. Here is the VDL:
> >>>>
> >>>> <p:dialog widgetVar="PopupDialog" fixedCenter="true"
> >>>> header="Customer Search" modal="true" close="false"> <h:form
> >>>> id="PopupDialogForm" prependId="false"> <h:messages
> >>>> globalOnly="true" errorClass="error" fatalClass="fatal"
> >>>> infoClass="info" warnClass="warn" /> <p:panel
> >>>> header="Customer Search"> <h:panelGrid columns="1">
> >>>> <h:panelGrid columns="2"> <h:outputLabel for="name"
> >>>> value="Name:" /> <h:inputText id="name"
> >>>> value="#{searchController.search.name}"
> >>>> label="#{msgs.label}"> <f:validateBean
> >>>> validationGroups="de.techjava.web.popup.validation.SearchGroup"
> >>>> /> </h:inputText> </h:panelGrid> <h:message for="name"
> >>>> id="name_msg" /> <p:commandButton value="Search"
> >>>> action="#{searchController.doSearch}" onsuccess="if (args) {
> >>>> var isValid = args.isValid; if (isValid) {
> >>>> PopupDialog.hide();}}" update="@form" process="@form" />
> >>>> </h:panelGrid> </p:panel> <p:panel header="Customer Search
> >>>> Result"> <p:dataTable id="items"
> >>>> value="#{searchController.result}" var="item"> <p:column>
> >>>> <f:facet name="header"> <h:outputText value="Name" />
> >>>> </f:facet> <h:outputText value="#{item.name}" /> </p:column>
> >>>> </p:dataTable> </p:panel> <p:commandButton value="Close"
> >>>> action="#{searchController.doCancel}"
> >>>> onsuccess="PopupDialog.hide()" update="@none" process="@this"
> >>>> /> </h:form> </p:dialog>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Any ideas?
> >>>>
> >>>> Kind regards,
> >>>>
> >>>> Simon
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkxG58sACgkQwNq/QDsDo2u+xwCeOqGDaTDYG5vJAYgNbwFZR+eS
> rHgAn19a0eNFVR2z6jo1KwjfpUMNgTF8
> =Xh/9
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>

--000e0cd254140b6b6e048be5828a--