Mailing-List: contact users-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "MyFaces Discussion" <users@myfaces.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sethfromaustria@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.220.228 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=pHeMzuQ+6idjmydZCATINudUantbEX79kTS/lWJAX44R+UWcV+sZfY1yxtC/GX5ZOE
         6ZAwPOND7aw5F4ZGm9ShxlMOgQili9hYX0YdTIoro3JKG723Ye8QXUg7eK7vZT58VFFM
         sKGjzqTWcNza9upnfUzDD35+VVreuGtGHswIs=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: sethfromaustria@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <20100407115603.82650@gmx.net>
References: <20100401085159.256680@gmx.net>
	 <o2mfd49e8161004010248z7db41b74q88c2d330a02e3c9d@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20100401114041.279750@gmx.net>
	 <z2jfd49e8161004010516i437865bq18a622102108ae28@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20100401124824.253970@gmx.net>
	 <n2ufd49e8161004011053m56f9ca63g5008a32b42d74539@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20100407061430.245730@gmx.net> <hpha6a$fvt$1@dough.gmane.org>
	 <20100407115603.82650@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 14:06:30 +0200
Message-ID: <g2jfd49e8161004070506hc9fa2693l7eac6b47d52843d7@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: javascript error "jsf is not defined"
From: Jakob Korherr <jakob.korherr@gmail.com>
To: MyFaces Discussion <users@myfaces.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364d25b18246d50483a464f6

--0016364d25b18246d50483a464f6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

In JSF 2.0 you don't have to configure a view handler. It will decide
whether to use the new Facelets- or the JSP-ViewDeclarationLanguage in the
default ViewHandlerImpl.

Regards,
Jakob

2010/4/7 Matthias Leis <matthias.leis@gmx.net>

> You are right about the view handler. I forgot that JSF2 doesn't need
> afaces-config anymore. But I need it anyway for registering a phase
> listener. Anyway, if I remove the view handler from the faces-config, all=
 I
> get from my webapp is a blank page and no errors. Do I have to define a
> view-handler if I use a faces-config file or does JSF just use the dafaul=
t
> view handler?
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> > Datum: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 08:54:02 +0200
> > Von: Werner Punz <werner.punz@gmail.com>
> > An: users@myfaces.apache.org
> > Betreff: Re: javascript error "jsf is not defined"
>
> > Am 07.04.10 08:14, schrieb Matthias Leis:
> > > Hi Jakob,
> > >
> > > I guess I use the built-in facelets. At least this is the code from
> > faces-config:
> > > <view-handler>
> > >        com.sun.facelets.FaceletViewHandler
> > > </view-handler>
> > Wrong view handler... the jsf2 one is not under com.sun, but under
> > javax.faces.view.facelets and it is initialized automatically if you us=
e
> > myfaces and the jsf2 facelets (no further configuration is needed)
> > Com sun is the old Facelet 1.x stuff and the new tags cannot work under
> > it due to the extensions in the jsf2 lifecycle and view handler api.
> > So it is either old facelets or the jsf2 one but not a mix of both, sor=
t
> > of a hard break introduced by the namespace change from com.sun into
> > javax.facelets and due to the api changes, but better once a hard break
> > from old habits than having endless pain :-)
> >
> > Basically if you run in a pure jsf2 environment you can start to use
> > facelets without additional configuration on the faces-config side.
> >
> > Werner
> >
>
> --
> GRATIS f=C3=BCr alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
> Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01
>

--0016364d25b18246d50483a464f6--