Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 22408 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2010 13:49:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Mar 2010 13:49:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 7670 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2010 13:49:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-users-archive@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 7637 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2010 13:49:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "MyFaces Discussion" Delivered-To: mailing list users@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 7629 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2010 13:49:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:49:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gerhard.petracek@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.221 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.221] (HELO mail-ew0-f221.google.com) (209.85.219.221) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:49:10 +0000 Received: by ewy21 with SMTP id 21so434515ewy.25 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 06:48:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=HNq8+blO1oQJIKdP8zlRkzS2YcHqDLaF2oKKEXNDq5I=; b=WLpTJmDOUkhibL4LPl0F9baeTywAeR7KL9DAexS+HZS9dVo8i7cQT7668qWbv4Ha7V G0jCCb7w0zfLMdS+z+uvd+KodJZl7/rUEf+DarPyFSQnxzzJmqqOSTbait6KnMzrWnx1 kUz21Qp+Ob3+im4g9MDpN2lzDZZ4vmphkx22Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=AhorLiT9hclVOBTrOc8WmzIr2+wU6gd58DiVZGnEHFZUffU0c4qyQam0IW1/pDBGel YimXYrQJMLx88fPAHyurGVWtqLk3KmcWr5O1qQl9Ga0yapeTLuzV5WvdGpoCkYW6Xp35 Ixq8s3uVrrCXO5gWUnSYOZZKcs1VMAWhCxP1s= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.191.132 with SMTP id b4mr306362hbi.33.1269352128206; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 06:48:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <33617.49215.qm@web27805.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> From: Gerhard Petracek Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:48:28 +0100 Message-ID: <2332f63b1003230648y5ad8378bud7b8821748fd4020@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Problem with BeanValidation in myfaces 2.0 To: MyFaces Discussion Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163649a1f5b259b70482781278 --00163649a1f5b259b70482781278 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable as alternative users can also test the bv integration provided by myfaces extval2. compared to the standard integration of bv in jsf 2.0 it offers more advanced and typesafe features. early adaptors would help to improve it. e.g. i saw that at least one version of the jsf2 ri had some issues with bv (it's already fixed in the current one). however, it would be nice to get some feedback about the latest myfaces core2 version in combination with myfaces extval2. the last one i tested worked pretty well. regards, gerhard http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2010/3/23 Jakob Korherr > I don't know Mark, since Leonardo said that he wants to do beta releases = on > a regular basis now I don't think it will take long until we release the > next beta. > > So do you think it is that important to have it in beta-3? Or can it wait > for the next beta? > > Regards, > Jakob > > 2010/3/23 Mark Struberg > > > To me this sounds like a blocker for beta3, isn't? > > > > txs and LieGrue, > > strub > > > > --- Jakob Korherr schrieb am Di, 23.3.2010: > > > > > Von: Jakob Korherr > > > Betreff: Re: Problem with BeanValidation in myfaces 2.0 > > > An: "MyFaces Discussion" > > > Datum: Dienstag, 23. M=E4rz, 2010 00:32 Uhr > > > Hi Marcus, > > > > > > There have been some problems with el-api 2.2 recently and > > > I guess the > > > current solution is just not yet very stable. I'll work on > > > that tomorrow! > > > > > > Regards, > > > Jakob > > > > > > 2010/3/22 Marcus B=FCttner > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I have a problem with BeanValidation in myfaces 2.0. > > > > > > > > The method getUELValueReference in > > > _BeanValidatorUELUtils calls the > > > > getValueReference methode from the given > > > ValueExpression. > > > > In el-api 2.2 this method always returns null and e.g. > > > in > > > > TagValueExpression in myfaces the method is not > > > overriden. > > > > > > > > So the ValueReference is always null and > > > BeanValdiation breaks. > > > > > > > > Any ideas? > > > > > > > > Thanks, regards > > > > Marcus > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verf=FCgt =FCber einen herausragenden S= chutz > > gegen Massenmails. > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > --00163649a1f5b259b70482781278--