Return-Path: 
 <users-return-52041-apmail-myfaces-users-archive=myfaces.apache.org@myfaces.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-users-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 77745 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2008 19:04:15 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Oct 2008 19:04:15 -0000
Received: (qmail 87093 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2008 19:04:14 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-users-archive@myfaces.apache.org
Received: (qmail 86767 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2008 19:04:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:users-help@myfaces.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@myfaces.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:users@myfaces.apache.org>
List-Id: <users.myfaces.apache.org>
Reply-To: "MyFaces Discussion" <users@myfaces.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list users@myfaces.apache.org
Received: (qmail 86754 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2008 19:04:13 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:04:13 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of daraii.tech@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.217.20 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.217.20] (HELO mail-gx0-f20.google.com) (209.85.217.20)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 19:03:04 +0000
Received: by gxk13 with SMTP id 13so5182546gxk.12
        for <users@myfaces.apache.org>; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:02:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
         :subject:mime-version:content-type;
        bh=vRncRUc1zv0+M1pcAXX8SqnTPI3zFveLPviX7aHVEHo=;
        b=uVzLpyrSsx70IgHZotO9Ovv34vqv5dHISFsIs8COAGOwq346ZHcjOKi/uJmRtGhbFf
         XWjeHPCLT/+wz5Vg5pk5rkh5X1+2uiTVS3WyVhRW1qs5zDIpa1Kw6kRlHHh6D3M7FvQI
         zdTON2/USC02nUb60ojWhW+Dv6orwmMMeCSOk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type;
        b=SwddKw54RMp/Hceq7Q2hpiuPmVg826JY8kR1TksnoTk2j9+avLUutrLTL68II4ldi5
         mlq84V3EwT0N+bi3KR5rkQvZHAz7p8KFcefDtQPWr29lihlxqK5QUDFK+ccpUzByoz9U
         Cmo63Kp8sEgvmZ951Cj/ZzKmoaqSVhloQ8jTQ=
Received: by 10.103.220.18 with SMTP id x18mr3999287muq.81.1224529360857;
        Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:02:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.103.192.7 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:02:40 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <2328a9a90810201202w47688566wca881a54b7c25036@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:02:40 -0400
From: "Amaris Nieves" <daraii.tech@gmail.com>
To: "MyFaces Discussion" <users@myfaces.apache.org>
Subject: [TRINIDAD] Can Trinidad validators like tr:validateRegExp have client
 side validation?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_79579_6412423.1224529360851"
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

------=_Part_79579_6412423.1224529360851
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Do the validators that come with trinidad have client side validation?

------=_Part_79579_6412423.1224529360851
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

<div dir="ltr">Do the validators that come with trinidad have client side validation?<br></div>

------=_Part_79579_6412423.1224529360851--