Mailing-List: contact users-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "MyFaces Discussion" <users@myfaces.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of andrew.rw.robinson@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.200.173 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=MN8+zgO/DvMwrjatpqZlRG7wMj3qit2mjXmZSt+GhhjNzxn+6cmx5qEidQh/FMhO7a/gsx41uI1JDW1yMq0dB6+QOZpWT0O8oMJXrd+3cx0q3yCLjv3BbUisi0mCoRF4J8keQOZH/iDgOhuZmIe+jVPnN3EpoCqnNbUotmg/NFI=
Message-ID: <bc36a6210803210731j64f58190p988f6f2aa20ac5ce@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 08:31:12 -0600
From: "Andrew Robinson" <andrew.rw.robinson@gmail.com>
To: "MyFaces Discussion" <users@myfaces.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [Trinidad] tr:table varStatus not working for EL passed to
 included components
In-Reply-To: <47E37C30.6080905@tecnotp.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_4556_11640338.1206109872690"
References: <47E2B3A1.3080405@tecnotp.it>
	 <bc36a6210803201211s70fd6c34ob2df2070ba24348a@mail.gmail.com>
	 <47E2B907.9000801@tecnotp.it>
	 <bc36a6210803201232q26847a63wa6963155897d1f67@mail.gmail.com>
	 <47E2C71D.2020409@tecnotp.it>
	 <bc36a6210803201334k20036afch475f22173560747e@mail.gmail.com>
	 <47E37C30.6080905@tecnotp.it>

------=_Part_4556_11640338.1206109872690
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Could you whip up a quick and small demo and maybe I can find some time next
week to have a look?

-Andrew

On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 3:13 AM, Renzo Tomaselli <renzo.tomaselli@tecnotp.it>
wrote:

>  No way, using ui:decorate yields pretty much the same results.
> Conversely - retrieving current row index from the bean works fine.
> I'm afraid this issue is going to be appended to a list of facelets
> mysteries.
>
> -- Renzo
>
>
> Andrew Robinson wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Renzo Tomaselli<renzo.tomaselli@tecnotp.it> <renzo.tomaselli@tecnotp.it> wrote:
>
>
>  Andrew, I don't use any template. Never used one, actually I rely
>  heavily on composition components (many placeholders, one page).
>  Maybe a trivial workaround for this issue is to have a row getter
>  returning the row index, since #{row} is evaluated properly within the
>  inner component.
>
>
>  ui:composition, ui:decorate, ui:include and facelets user tags are all
> pretty much the same TagHandler. They don't share code, but their code
> is all very similar.
>
> So when you say:
> "where cx:valueHolder is an included component having:"
>
> you are using a template. facelet template, include, user tag all boil
> down to a Facelet class instance. So try the code I gave you instead
> of using cx:valueHolder.
>
> -Andrew
>
>
>
>
>

------=_Part_4556_11640338.1206109872690
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Could you whip up a quick and small demo and maybe I can find some time next week to have a look?<br><br>-Andrew<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 3:13 AM, Renzo Tomaselli &lt;<a href="mailto:renzo.tomaselli@tecnotp.it">renzo.tomaselli@tecnotp.it</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">


<div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
No way, using ui:decorate yields pretty much the same results.<br>
Conversely - retrieving current row index from the bean works fine.<br>
I&#39;m afraid this issue is going to be appended to a list of facelets
mysteries.<br><font color="#888888">
<br>
-- Renzo</font><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
<br>
Andrew Robinson wrote:
<blockquote type="cite">
  <pre>On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Renzo Tomaselli
<a href="mailto:renzo.tomaselli@tecnotp.it" target="_blank">&lt;renzo.tomaselli@tecnotp.it&gt;</a> wrote:
  </pre>
  <blockquote type="cite">
    <pre>Andrew, I don&#39;t use any template. Never used one, actually I rely
 heavily on composition components (many placeholders, one page).
 Maybe a trivial workaround for this issue is to have a row getter
 returning the row index, since #{row} is evaluated properly within the
 inner component.
    </pre>
  </blockquote>
  <pre>ui:composition, ui:decorate, ui:include and facelets user tags are all
pretty much the same TagHandler. They don&#39;t share code, but their code
is all very similar.

So when you say:
&quot;where cx:valueHolder is an included component having:&quot;

you are using a template. facelet template, include, user tag all boil
down to a Facelet class instance. So try the code I gave you instead
of using cx:valueHolder.

-Andrew


  </pre>
</blockquote>
</div></div></div>

</blockquote></div><br>

------=_Part_4556_11640338.1206109872690--