Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 70976 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2008 15:43:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jan 2008 15:43:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 47320 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2008 15:43:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-users-archive@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 47287 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2008 15:43:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "MyFaces Discussion" Delivered-To: mailing list users@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 47276 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jan 2008 15:43:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Jan 2008 07:43:08 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of andrew.rw.robinson@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.185 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.185] (HELO rv-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.198.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Jan 2008 15:42:46 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c27so3856525rvf.36 for ; Wed, 02 Jan 2008 07:42:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=2AHvNavLH87bDF193I7tO636IUWr8mIxeqcP1y1XbKg=; b=VvKKKzhA332kAX9nRaspH+7qiQWenOqsMhhAZIs8plaebJf8cnirOs2JR2O08Mx0Qh9AZZJThRpo8tRC1cR+nizvwdC44a+ucdb7eTEMhYygEXwfoOlru6IMgIwL3eqP3apxVBQJDFuqS8o9LPcLE29//+mTMp1YrntbYKluwD4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=GudUqPdSBNAD6ozZfmi8taZ4lOmwdGp2QhnFZ+H+3ejdoqkLXCj/Is92Yn/AqdqTuKWFrcXDGDG52DeiZWpZx/YxRAIYiPIzVfbmG4sEox268sbKnbez2cgjrGf4cKNzWcCwEUV1z3v6JLz1/uq+V7bfwB7z994f5eq5AaVRDwg= Received: by 10.141.15.19 with SMTP id s19mr6958175rvi.205.1199288570681; Wed, 02 Jan 2008 07:42:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.17.18 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Jan 2008 07:42:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 08:42:50 -0700 From: "Andrew Robinson" To: "MyFaces Discussion" Subject: Re: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <5BEE6A4FA81FD94185FF85F1BF5F4C962A294F@SRVTREBOL6> <9a64d7d10712200056q3f67020csa6c25cd649550db4@mail.gmail.com> <002501c84ce9$6a12ff60$1b01a8c0@jimmyau> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jan 1, 2008 7:44 PM, jimmyau wrote: > disabled and readonly work in the same way which will not submit value to > backend. this way also make me headache. Why would this give you a headache? What is the point in sending a read-only value to the server. Everything on the client is by definition changeable (users can change the DOM easily). So the server would never decode a read-only or disabled control. If you are never going to decode it, why waste the resources to post it back to the server?