Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 8817 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2007 14:03:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Aug 2007 14:03:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 5112 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2007 14:02:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-users-archive@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 5067 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2007 14:02:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "MyFaces Discussion" Delivered-To: mailing list users@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 5056 invoked by uid 99); 10 Aug 2007 14:02:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 07:02:55 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [199.228.142.74] (HELO plmler4.mail.eds.com) (199.228.142.74) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:02:48 +0000 Received: from plmlir4.mail.eds.com (plmlir4-2.mail.eds.com [199.228.142.134]) by plmler4.mail.eds.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l7AE2Q5m030361 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 09:02:27 -0500 Received: from plmlir4.mail.eds.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by plmlir4.mail.eds.com (8.13.8/8.12.10) with ESMTP id l7AE2K0h006635 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 09:02:20 -0500 Received: from usplm015.amer.corp.eds.com ([148.94.166.8]) by plmlir4.mail.eds.com (8.13.8/8.12.10) with ESMTP id l7AE2KHS006630 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 09:02:20 -0500 Received: from usahm210.amer.corp.eds.com ([130.175.198.42]) by usplm015.amer.corp.eds.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 10 Aug 2007 09:02:20 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [Trinidad] Logging Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 10:02:19 -0400 Message-ID: <386B9A4E43A8184188587EC0233F66990109EC32@usahm210.amer.corp.eds.com> In-Reply-To: <6dac79b90708100658k49384326q4ff885fa4bc08ef5@mail.gmail.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [Trinidad] Logging Thread-Index: AcfbVswDcIzMoKkKTaGZssuF4453PQAACY+Q References: <82BB51083948AC41A77034C2D9C4ADC301557CAB@us-atl-mx03.infor.com> <6dac79b90708100658k49384326q4ff885fa4bc08ef5@mail.gmail.com> From: "Butash, Bob" To: "MyFaces Discussion" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Aug 2007 14:02:20.0156 (UTC) FILETIME=[11428BC0:01C7DB57] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org What about commons logging - would we see that used still or just the switch to directly using Java Logging. Thanks,=20 Bob -----Original Message----- From: Adam Winer [mailto:awiner@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 9:58 AM To: MyFaces Discussion Subject: Re: [Trinidad] Logging No. If anything, the rest of MyFaces is likely to move away from Log4J once they can require Java 5. java.util.logging.* is the standard as of Java 5. -- Adam On 8/10/07, Murtaza Goga wrote: > > > > > Are there any plans to migrate the logging in Trinidad to use Log4j? =20 > Is there a mechanism we could use Log4j. > > > > Thanks, > > Murtaza. > >