Mailing-List: contact users-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "MyFaces Discussion" <users@myfaces.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of mwessendorf@gmail.com
 designates 66.249.92.173 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=qtEmgceRw8jjOFSWr55s4qC2S3UqBfnHVj8tX8YoacXiTfTHeDRhDsSIf0JtlxjFzIsM7i1CaLL6a4SR1pOApsbWyy4IZg84l9lZfnTnB2235/y2z+QtdQ2geWJRZJ6feYFOnY/OUo9pyuPfFpWwIq6BDJgNgJvKWp+wbZc6/UU=
Message-ID: <71235db40705230922s569ef6d3u36f22f44fd7898c0@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 09:22:28 -0700
From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <matzew@apache.org>
Sender: mwessendorf@gmail.com
To: "MyFaces Discussion" <users@myfaces.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Why so many problems with MyFaces?
In-Reply-To: <10767462.post@talk.nabble.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <10766660.post@talk.nabble.com>
	 <7D4D7E701546E34D9BF0D1E80F76209E01E09282@EMEXM0203.dir.svc.accenture.com>
	 <10767462.post@talk.nabble.com>

use ruby on rails.
that solves all address book problems, you have
:-)

On 5/23/07, SiSi'mon <s_simon@purpleblade.net> wrote:
>
> No, the problem is definitely with MyFaces.  I have used many other UI
> frameworks in the past with fewer problems.  We have gone through most all
> of the documentation we have with MyFaces.
>
> This technology seems to be lacking.  Maybe it will work in a few years.
> The documentation on the apache web site is completely incorrect regarding
> saveState.  I can go on and on.
>
>
>
> mario.buonopane wrote:
> >
> > MyFaces is not a specification is just an implementation. If you prefer
> > you can choice other implementation. I just want to say that I'm using
> > MyFaces + Tomahawk + Struts Tyles + Shale and I didn't see any delay,
> > just advantages!
> >
> > May be the problem are you?
> >
> > Mario
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: SiSi'mon [mailto:s_simon@purpleblade.net]
> > Sent: 23 maggio 2007 17.44
> > To: users@myfaces.apache.org
> > Subject: Why so many problems with MyFaces?
> >
> >
> > Does anyone know why Myfaces sucks so much?  It was supposed to solve
> > some
> > problems but we have seen nothing but project delays since deciding to
> > use
> > it.
> >
> > Is it a poor specification or a poor implementation of a very bad
> > specification or a very bad implementation of a very bad idea?
> >
> > Si'mon
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> > http://www.nabble.com/Why-so-many-problems-with-MyFaces--tf3804863.html#
> > a10766660
> > Sent from the MyFaces - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> >
> >
> > This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
> > privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  If you have
> > received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the
> > original.  Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Why-so-many-problems-with-MyFaces--tf3804863.html#a10767462
> Sent from the MyFaces - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>


-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org