Mailing-List: contact users-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "MyFaces Discussion" <users@myfaces.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of rudi.steiner@googlemail.com
 designates 64.233.162.239 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=gATKvDfuEUsdyBbpo8z5aAbeB+uhbBdWHOVGpoyI4vEh/aNAIhTDaeRgSpAeMdEbAeuU7wPDCFSuH78YKjbwV2mAwHeruD0epzQtG50BJLnaPVue3pPUasEJYajsPFIzuSH9N4nS6VVLzrUH8sOrx7K2llDt8+q2XWDE4gqkJlU=
Message-ID: <dddc59730704040831l28ca28a8pcaf68ad280725d90@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 17:31:36 +0200
From: "Rudi Steiner" <rudi.steiner@googlemail.com>
To: "MyFaces Discussion" <users@myfaces.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Standardcompliance of rendered markup
In-Reply-To: <9a64d7d10704040655n2b79614bk84febd63ce0d964a@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <dddc59730704030631t628922aen59363eae8bc53770@mail.gmail.com>
	 <8f985b960704031256g4e6731e8sf1a1fefc845a4cf0@mail.gmail.com>
	 <5de41c7d0704031428kc2d8909p4ca2a708ac9d6bec@mail.gmail.com>
	 <8f985b960704031502r4a34e1c0of90e0addf3891492@mail.gmail.com>
	 <dddc59730704040531n6ae10021gb45835a2c02d726d@mail.gmail.com>
	 <9a64d7d10704040655n2b79614bk84febd63ce0d964a@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Volker,

the jsf code is the following:

<t:dataTable
=09=09=09forceId=3D"true"
=09=09=09id=3D"dataTable"
=09=09=09width=3D"100%"
=09=09=09styleClass=3D"standardTable"
=09=09=09headerClass=3D"standardTable_Header"
=09=09=09footerClass=3D"standardTable_Header"
=09=09=09rowClasses=3D"standardTable_Row1,standardTable_Row2"
=09=09=09columnClasses=3D"standardTable_Column,standardTable_ColumnCentered=
,standardTable_Column"
=09=09=09var=3D"service"
=09=09=09value=3D"#{ServicesBean.dataModel}"
=09=09=09preserveDataModel=3D"false" rows=3D"10">


Maybe this id's have strange values, because I extended the paging
mechanism of the table as described in the myFaces WIKI
(http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/WorkingWithLargeTables). Have you any
idea, how I can influence the id-generation of this mechanism?


Thank you,
Rudi

On 4/4/07, Volker Weber <v.weber@inexso.de> wrote:
> Hi Rudi,
>
> can you post the relevant jsf code,
>
> this looks not like a jsf generated id.
>
> Regards,
>   Volker
>
> 2007/4/4, Rudi Steiner <rudi.steiner@googlemail.com>:
> > Hello,
> >
> > thanks a lot to everybody.
> >
> > @Mike: I removed on form on the page and wrap all the formcontent by
> > one form-element. So this problem is resolved.
> >
> > But valuating the new page, I get the following error for the markup
> > rendered by the <t:datatable/> - tag :
> >
> > Error  Line 85 column 83: character "[" is not allowed in the value of
> > attribute "id".
> >
> > ...dardTable_Column"><span id=3D"ot_servId[0]">41315</span></td><td cla=
ss=3D"standar
> >
> > It is possible that you violated the naming convention for this
> > attribute. For example, id and name attributes must begin with a
> > letter, not a digit.
> >
> >
> > Should I report this as a bug in Jira?
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Rudi
> >
> >
> >
> > On 4/4/07, Mike Kienenberger <mkienenb@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Jorn,
> > >
> > > I don't know if the id is required by the spec or not.  Or if there's
> > > some reason why it's required by the MyFaces implementation.   If you
> > > want to look into that and report back on your findings, maybe we can
> > > consider changing it.   I know that identical hidden fields must be
> > > present for each form on the page, though.
> > >
> > > On 4/3/07, J=F6rn Zaefferer <joern.zaefferer@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 4/3/07, Mike Kienenberger <mkienenb@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Definitely open JIRA issues (preferrably with patches) for all bu=
t one
> > > > > of these items.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Error  Line 101 column 165: ID "jsf_tree_64" already defined.
> > > > >
> > > > > The above will not be fixed -- this element must exist and be
> > > > > submitted in every form.
> > > >
> > > > Is there any reason against simply removing the ID? As long as the =
element
> > > > has the correct name and is inside the form it should work without =
any
> > > > issues. XHTML compliance to come! Though I prefer HTLM 4.01 strict.=
..
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>