Mailing-List: contact users-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "MyFaces Discussion" <users@myfaces.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of mkienenb@gmail.com designates
 64.233.162.226 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=EtEhB8NTRJIgOGsatXsIvMK3SKdTlJJ0Ll7Mqe/eSKalsEvmJPtHFYLFCZylOcrLnqFwl9x3HVBZrl79mnUq9XKZ8thZPWSul8lFgVqJD8oKTDOqtZSXuKiv+7DbJT0KGuIRSN0snRWSKTFm4MwEzzktTg7OARnBNOur1Xn7g00=
Message-ID: <8f985b960704120923s1ec90322vd0db1184ad977860@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 12:23:00 -0400
From: "Mike Kienenberger" <mkienenb@gmail.com>
To: "MyFaces Discussion" <users@myfaces.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Cross validation problem
In-Reply-To: 
 <803E7CC272B5144DAF6D1254F99DAA6F1F30D1@S-DC-EXM11.net1.cec.eu.int>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <8f985b960704120859m2eb329a3ndd15221c2701ff58@mail.gmail.com>
	 <803E7CC272B5144DAF6D1254F99DAA6F1F30D1@S-DC-EXM11.net1.cec.eu.int>

http://myfaces.apache.org/sandbox/validateCompareTo.html

Also in comments in the source code.


On 4/12/07, Stephane.CLINCKART@ext.ec.europa.eu
<Stephane.CLINCKART@ext.ec.europa.eu> wrote:
> Thanks for hint.
>
> Where can I find a sample of usage of t:compareToValidator ?
>
> Thanks.
>
> PS: It should be better for me to make the vaidation in the validators... For several reasons to long to explain here.
>     Thanks for help again.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:mkienenb@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 5:59 PM
> To: MyFaces Discussion
> Subject: Re: Cross validation problem
>
> You can take a look at the details of how to handle cross-component
> validation by reading the source code for the Tomahawk sandbox
> t:compareToValidator validator.
>
> However, this is probably a case where it makes more sense to perform
> your business validation in the action.
>
> On 4/12/07, Stephane.CLINCKART@ext.ec.europa.eu
> <Stephane.CLINCKART@ext.ec.europa.eu> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > In a login page I have 3 components:
> >
> > Login
> > Password
> > Domain
> >
> > I have a validator for Login & Password
> >
> > I should like in Validator of password to "knows" the value of the Domain.
> > The value of the domain is not set when I validate the password.
> >
> > Do I have somethink special to do for defining the setting order?
> >
> > How to perform a "cross component validation"?
> >
> > Thanks a lot.
> >
> > Stephane
>