myfaces-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Adrian Mitev" <adrian.mi...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: Tomahawk release plans?
Date Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:21:59 GMT
Hi, Werner! You could post that as comment to my issue at
javaserverfaces-spec

2007/3/16, Werner Punz <werner.punz@gmail.com>:
>
> Adrian Mitev schrieb:
> > I've posted RFE for jsf 2.0 [1] about api for component development.
> >
> >
> https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=246
> > <
> https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=246
> >
> >
>
> Hi Adrian I think this does not go too far enough, a handful of common
> utils classes does not really help with the problem
>
> what is needed is to tackle the problem on various ends
> a) way too much configuration, try to get rid of it entirely, move the
> entire configuration into annotations and probably also get rid of
> the entire taglib binding classes that way.
>
> that way we also probably could get rid of the entire save and restore
> code, and the properties simply would be setters and getters with the
> save restore bindings woven around
>
> b) we need a renderer templating engine, but not like jsp more along the
> lines of velocity which can be used optionally
>
> c) we need something high level (goes hand in hand with b)
> eventually adding facelets to the mix, but with the possibility
> to hook in custrom control classes in a rather seamless way (this would
> be the same combination as in b, with facelets as templating for the
> component)
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message