Return-Path: 
 <users-return-32433-apmail-myfaces-users-archive=myfaces.apache.org@myfaces.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-users-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 88653 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2006 19:49:29 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Dec 2006 19:49:29 -0000
Received: (qmail 89595 invoked by uid 500); 18 Dec 2006 19:49:32 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-users-archive@myfaces.apache.org
Received: (qmail 89548 invoked by uid 500); 18 Dec 2006 19:49:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:users-help@myfaces.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@myfaces.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:users@myfaces.apache.org>
List-Id: <users.myfaces.apache.org>
Reply-To: "MyFaces Discussion" <users@myfaces.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list users@myfaces.apache.org
Received: (qmail 89537 invoked by uid 99); 18 Dec 2006 19:49:32 -0000
Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:49:32 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of mario@ops.co.at designates
 194.152.182.5 as permitted sender)
Received: from [194.152.182.5] (HELO mgate.ops.co.at) (194.152.182.5)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:49:21 -0800
Received: from smtp.ops.co.at (ops004.ops.co.at [194.152.182.4])
	by mgate.ops.co.at (OPS Mail Gateway - authorized use only - NO UCE/UBE C=AT
 L=VIE) with ESMTP id EABC32053B7
	for <users@myfaces.apache.org>; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 20:48:59 +0100 (CET)
Received: by smtp.ops.co.at (Postfix, from userid 65534)
	id D8B8023C0E2; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 20:48:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [172.26.2.115] (unknown [172.26.1.2])
	by smtp.ops.co.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0213C23C0AF
	for <users@myfaces.apache.org>; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 20:48:55 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4586F0A7.4050005@ops.co.at>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 20:48:55 +0100
From: Mario Ivankovits <mario@ops.co.at>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20060911)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: MyFaces Discussion <users@myfaces.apache.org>
Subject: Re: t:document tags and xhtml
References: <1166459090.8924.2.camel@pial>
In-Reply-To: <1166459090.8924.2.camel@pial>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on smtp.ops.co.at
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Old-Spam-Status: No,
 hits=-12.3 required=6.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
	IMPRONONCABLE_1,J_CHICKENPOX_18,NO_RDNS,RATWR10_MESSID,SARE_TOCC_USER,
	TW_XH autolearn=no version=2.64

Hi Brad!
> I have seen recommendations on the myfaces wiki that performance of JSF
> can be improved if <t:document> tags are used.  Will these tags produce
> valid and well formed xhtml?  Or can they be configured to do so?
>   
They are just replacements for html's html, head, body.
So if a page wasn't well formed without using them, they wont be afterwards.

In fact, what happen will be is (if you use these tags in conjunction
with StreamingAddResource) that the <script> tags will be rendered
within the bode instead of the head, though, this shouldn't be bad.

Did you experience any problems?


Ciao,
Mario