myfaces-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Aneesha Govil" <popcor...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: general myfaces performance question
Date Thu, 16 Nov 2006 09:48:25 GMT
Is it alright to use Trinidad while it is still in the incubator?

Aneesha

On 11/16/06, Martin Marinschek <martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> He should definitely take the Trinidad component set for high
> performance requirements, with this, you're in the same region as
> Struts for performance (probably better - cause if you do it yourself,
> you won't get the same optimized state-saving as is implemented in
> Trinidad).
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 11/15/06, Werner Punz <werpu@gmx.at> wrote:
> > Ok, before anyone is falling down the chair because I ask this question.
> > Here we go. A friend of mine is looking for a struts replacement
> > framework covering extranet sites.
> >
> > Well here we go, my experience with jsf in the past is, that it was not
> > too suitable for extranet, but is a perfect choice for intranet sites.
> > The reason, higher overhead than plain lean frameworks only covering a
> > minimalistic approach.
> >
> > The situation has changed however, facelets give a huge performance
> > boost due to good caching.
> > But I lack experience, I know several bigger intranet installations,
> > but extranet is a fully different beast.
> >
> > So my question how good does jsf scale nowadays in those cases.
> > Does anyone have any experience or samples?
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>

Mime
View raw message