Mailing-List: contact users-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "MyFaces Discussion" <users@myfaces.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (idunn.apache.osuosl.org: domain gmail.com designates
 64.233.162.201 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: good
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=VMGd9XTN3g+K8AefxKU1NucdJY1WT2dTnNIv5gNsORCYADZwRkFebus96RUN1KopHgO1FOQ8kfZPMfTtvp8RK25jfBT+sxXPcshAMQHT1Pn5wWYifGv1RfayKUvFd5/4hY9kGPnDLCD91KyVLR/YDHHp9MsgYaOSTyDTKTLTsFY=
Message-ID: <311295120609120721l8970124o6a1f7b39b88e80df@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 16:21:57 +0200
From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gerald_M=FCllan?=" <bierbrauen@gmail.com>
To: "MyFaces Discussion" <users@myfaces.apache.org>
Subject: Re: AW: AJAX for JSF
In-Reply-To: <4506BE8C.8030604@gradecak.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: 
 <D3478E57401766439DE044C8251081E502D106C2@kstbm01a.ww010.siemens.net>
	 <4506BE8C.8030604@gradecak.com>

Yeah, ajax4jsf is still in early development but they arise in a quick manner.

I am not the portlet-guru but for portlets you need special
portlet-requests and I don`t know if even the sandbox components would
work in a portlet environment.

When using an own AJAX framework it depends also on what requirements you have.
E.g. partial page rendering is also possible with myfaces when using
latest svn-head.

Apart from this, myfaces currently has no special generic AJAX support.

regards,

Gerald

On 9/12/06, Daniel Gradecak <daniel@gradecak.com> wrote:
> I need ajax4jsf inside portlets also. I tried it something like one
> month ago and it was not working. Myfaces has ajax support in the
> sandbox which seems to be promising.
> Anyway, ajax4jsf guys told me to stay tunned on the mailing list for new
> announcements but i am still waiting :-)
>
> Right now I choose to use DWR ...
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
>
> Pfau, Oliver wrote:
> > Is a version of Ajax4Jsf planned to support portlets ?
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > *Von:* Adam Brod [mailto:ABrod@intralinks.com]
> > *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 12. September 2006 15:53
> > *An:* MyFaces Discussion
> > *Betreff:* Re: AJAX for JSF
> >
> >
> > Ajax4Jsf is really good.  The DynamicFaces project in jsf-extensions
> > is very promising, but it isn't ready to be used in a real application
> > yet.
> >
> > I really think Ajax4Jsf is your best bet if you want to develop JSF +
> > Ajax today.
> > *
> > Adam Brod*/
> > Product Development Team/
> >
> >
> > "Stephen Osella" <sosella@austin.rr.com> wrote on 09/12/2006 09:18:48 AM:
> >
> > > Is there a good (i.e., working!) AJAX for JSF framework?  I have tried
> > > AjaxAnywhere and Ajax4jsf with varying degree (but not complete)
> > success.
> > > Your opinion and recommendations would be greatly appreciated.
> > >
> > Disclaimer: This electronic mail and any attachments are confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email, and destroy all copies of this email and any attachments. Thank you.
> >
> >
> >
> > __________ NOD32 1.1751 (20060912) Informacija __________
> >
> > Ova je poruka provjerena NOD32 antivirusnim sistemom.
> > http://www.nod32.com.hr
>
>


-- 
http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces