myfaces-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Iordanov, Borislav \(GIC\)" <bo...@miamidade.gov>
Subject RE: Portlet examples needed by portlet/MyFaces users
Date Fri, 15 Sep 2006 03:07:49 GMT
Ok, I'll think of something. I assume myfaces developers monitor this
list as I might need some help with the source code.

Has anyone looked at how the reference implementation integrates with
portlets? Does it at all, actually?

Best,
Bolerio
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:mkienenb@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 6:37 PM
To: MyFaces Discussion
Subject: Re: Portlet examples needed by portlet/MyFaces users

I think Stan has moved on to other projects for now, and may not be
monitoring this list.

If you want to propose, discuss, and implement a specific alternative,
that would be great!

On 9/14/06, Iordanov, Borislav (GIC) <boris@miamidade.gov> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Regarding portlets and myfaces integration, I noticed another "detail"
> that will potentially become a serious headache: the FacesContext
> instance is kept in the portlet session. So, if I have 10 portlets on
a
> page, I have 10 FacesContext instances per user eating up me server
> memory. This is unacceptable from a performance perspective. Could Mr.
> Stan Silvert (stated author of myfacesgenericportlet) explain the
design
> decision? Are there alternatives?
>
> Thanks,
> Bolerio
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:mkienenb@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 6:48 PM
> To: MyFaces Discussion
> Subject: Re: Portlet examples needed by portlet/MyFaces users
>
> I'm sure it's possible.  Facelets did it.  I use jstl functions in my
> pages under facelets.
>
> On 9/13/06, Iordanov, Borislav (GIC) <boris@miamidade.gov> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does anybody know whether it's possible and how to write a customer
> > variable resolver for the standard implementation of JSTL? That'll
> solve
> > another problem with portlets: JSF correctly puts managed beans in a
> > portlet session (via the external context I guess), but the JSTL EL
> > looks at the "servlet level" so you can't access JSF managed beans
> with
> > JSTL. This has probably been discussed at length and probably there
is
> a
> > standard solution and probably it'll be dealt with in the upcoming
> > version of the specs, but in the meantime....?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Bolerio
> >
>

Mime
View raw message