Mailing-List: contact users-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "MyFaces Discussion" <users@myfaces.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: Problem while deploying in IBM WebSpher Application Server 5.1
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:08:57 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <67538F65C12991418BE2801290008A070134D39E@ilnort1msgusr15.ITServices.sbc.com>
Thread-Topic: Problem while deploying in IBM WebSpher Application Server 5.1
Thread-Index: AcXb6f4qvSRyRoFWSiie/8PPYSwuggACMVCQ
From: "CONNER, BRENDAN \(SBCSI\)" <bc1378@sbc.com>
To: "MyFaces Discussion" <users@myfaces.apache.org>

We have not run into problems with the jsp-2.0.jar file, but we also =
don't use PARENT_LAST.  Let us know what you find with that combination. =
;-)

- Brendan

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Hedstr=F6m [mailto:erich@ucsd.edu]=20
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 1:04 PM
To: MyFaces Discussion
Subject: Re: Problem while deploying in IBM WebSpher Application Server =
5.1


Have you run into any problems bundling jsp-2.0.jar in a jsp-1.2=20
container like WebSphere 5.1? We are leery of doing this because (due to =

some other jar version conflicts with WebSphere) we have to run our web=20
app with the classloader set to PARENT_LAST.

On 27 Oct 2005 8:32, CONNER, BRENDAN (SBCSI) wrote:

> We have the following JARs in our lib directory (in a working =
WebSphere=20
> environment):
> =20
> commons-beanutils-1.6.1.jar
> commons-codec-1.2.jar
> commons-collections-3.0.jar
> commons-digester-1.5.jar
> commons-el.jar
> commons-fileupload-1.0.jar
> commons-lang-2.1.jar
> commons-validator.jar
> jaxen-full.jar
> jsp-2.0.jar
> jstl_el.jar
> jstl.jar
> myfaces-api.jar
> myfaces-impl.jar
> saxpath.jar
> standard.jar
> struts.jar (for Tiles)
> tomahawk.jar
> =20
> BTW, awhile back, we were putting myfaces-wap.jar and=20
> myfaces-xdoclet.jar into our lib directory.  Are these still used?
> =20
> - Brendan
> =20
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* Anjaneyulu Sadineni [mailto:sadinenia@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 27, 2005 10:00 AM
> *To:* MyFaces Discussion
> *Subject:* Re: Problem while deploying in IBM WebSpher Application=20
> Server 5.1
>=20
>     Hi,
>       We didn't have jsp-api.jar in lib dir. Do we need to have
>     jsp-api.jar in lib dir ..?
>     =20
>     Thanks
>=20
>=20
>     =20
>     On 10/27/05, *rosalba bochicchio* <rosalba_2001@yahoo.it
>     <mailto:rosalba_2001@yahoo.it>> wrote:
>=20
>         Did you include jsp-api.jar in your lib?
>=20
>         --- Anjaneyulu Sadineni < sadinenia@gmail.com
>         <mailto:sadinenia@gmail.com>> wrote:
>=20
>          > Dear Ryan,
>          >  Thanks for ur reply. We are using My Faces and
>          > tomahawk only. We have the
>          > following JSF related jars in class path.
>          >  Myfaces-impl.jar , myfaces-api.jar, tomahawk.jar .
>          >    Thanks
>          >
>          >
>          >
>          >  On 10/26/05, Ryan Wynn <rwynn@us.ibm.com
>         <mailto:rwynn@us.ibm.com>> wrote:
>          > >
>          > >
>          > > What type of jsf configuration are you trying to
>          > support? Only MyFaces,
>          > > reference impl. + tomahawk, any of the ibm-jsf
>          > stuff? I have had problems
>          > > with some of the combinations.
>          > >
>          > > For example, when I tried reference impl. +
>          > tomahawk I could not start the
>          > > web app because the faces-config parser was trying
>          > to go out to the internet
>          > > and retrieve a reference to something in the
>          > tomahawk faces-config.xml . It
>          > > couldn't find it so the application wouldn't
>          > start. This only happened when
>          > > using the reference impl. MyFaces across the board
>          > did not go after this
>          > > reference.
>          > >
>          > > If you could please list the jsf related jars in
>          > your classpath.
>          > >
>          > >
>          > >
>          > >
>          > >   *"CONNER, BRENDAN \(SBCSI\)" < bc1378@sbc.com
>         <mailto:bc1378@sbc.com> >*
>          > >
>          > > 10/26/2005 02:39 PM   Please respond to
>          > > "MyFaces Discussion"
>          > >
>          > >    To
>          > > "MyFaces Discussion" < users@myfaces.apache.org
>         <mailto:users@myfaces.apache.org> >
>          > cc
>          > >   Subject
>          > > RE: Problem while deploying in IBM WebSpher
>          > Application Server 5.1
>          > >
>          > >
>          > >
>          > >
>          > > There should be no conflicts as log as you don't
>          > include IBM's JSF JAR
>          > > files in your EAR.
>          > >
>          > > - Brendan
>          > > -----Original Message-----*
>          > > From:* Anjaneyulu Sadineni [mailto:
>          > sadinenia@gmail.com <mailto:sadinenia@gmail.com>] *
>          > > Sent:* Wednesday, October 26, 2005 1:34 PM*
>          > > To:* MyFaces Discussion*
>          > > Subject:* Problem while deploying in IBM WebSpher
>          > Application Server 5.1
>          > >
>          > > Hi,
>          > > We have been using my faces in our application and
>          > it is working fine in
>          > > TOMCAT 5.0. But, We are not able to deploy same
>          > war file in IBM WebSpher
>          > > Application Server 5.1. We are getting the
>          > following msg
>          > > as "Application falied to Intialize" and then the
>          > server is getting
>          > > stopped .
>          > > But when we remove the myfaces-impl.jar from war
>          > file, we are able to
>          > > deploy it. Is there any conflicts ere between
>          > myfaces-impl.jar and IBM
>          > > jars ?.Please let us know if u have any idea on
>          > this Problem.
>          > >
>          > > Advance thanks for ur help.
>          > >
>          > > Thanks
>          > >
>          >
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>         __________________________________
>         Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
>         http://mail.yahoo.com
>=20
>=20