myfaces-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Saul Qunming Yuan" <y...@dataanvil.com>
Subject Re: Question
Date Sun, 25 Sep 2005 15:02:23 GMT
I think that's addressed in the release note, for 1.1.0, it's:

http://myfaces.apache.org/RELEASE-NOTES-1.1.0.txt


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tali Garsiel" <tgarsiel@mercury.com>
To: "'MyFaces Discussion'" <users@myfaces.apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2005 8:45 AM
Subject: RE: Question


> Hi,
> 
> Is there a list of changes made in each revision?
> 
> Tali
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: news [mailto:news@sea.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Werner Punz
> Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2005 4:06 PM
> To: users@myfaces.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Question
> 
> Best practice probably is, to donate the components
> so that api changes in tomahawk will be adjusted within
> your components as well.
> 
> If that is no option probably trying to program against pure JSF
> is the safest to keep your codebase stable.
> 
> But feel free to program against tomahwak, but be prepared to do some
> adjustment
> of your codebase from revision to revision.
> 
> Werner
> 
> 
> Tali Garsiel wrote:
>> Thanks Werner,
>> 
>> So what do you think is the best practice when extending tomahawk ?
>> 
>> If you needed to extend - would you use current API and fix in case of
>> change , or avoid extending altogether or some other option?
>> 
>> Tali
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: news [mailto:news@sea.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Werner Punz
>> Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2005 3:24 PM
>> To: users@myfaces.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Question
>> 
>> You can expect that the JSF 1.1 API wont be changed in the long run
>> however the suite will move towards JSF 1.2 ;-), but the core always
>> has to adobt the standard given from sun.
>> 
>> as for the tomahawk components, you cannot really expect a full api
>> stability there
>> some internals can change from one rev to the other, mostly due to
>> bugfixes...
>> (I had such an issue yesterday when I was prepping a component for the
>> sandbox which was originally
>> programmed against 1.0.9)
>> 
>> for the sandbox components, there is no api stability whatsoever, those
>> components are alpha
>> or beta if at all, therefore they are called sandbox...
>> 
>> Werner
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Tali Garsiel wrote:
>> 
>>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>I'm extending some of myfaces components.
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>Can I use the public and protected functions?
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>Can I be sure they will still be there next version?
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>Thanks , Tali
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>
>>>______________________________________________________________________
>>>This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
>>>For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
>>>______________________________________________________________________
>> 
>> 
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
>> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
> ______________________________________________________________________

Mime
View raw message