Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 21191 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2005 15:40:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2005 15:40:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 49347 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2005 15:40:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-users-archive@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 49321 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2005 15:40:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "MyFaces Discussion" Delivered-To: mailing list users@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 49308 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2005 15:40:12 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:40:12 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of martin.marinschek@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.203 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.184.203] (HELO wproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.184.203) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:40:04 -0700 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i18so189629wra for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:40:09 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=VArPPWVfsFCE/qiHbZt1lKd9ImTmxJrw2Y9NMt11OfO6ZzqroXG/MH/JSzelwp5Rqs+ldlrqg27jNYs5mDJl00NYfdjJ7kTWXh6UHYp5Wt75xnfPoM8UMdOlBFOfi8lOrZc/pNrmalxB9EFnBRdP1+7w05yJy5Vw1xC3TBm4gJE= Received: by 10.54.54.60 with SMTP id c60mr377940wra; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:40:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.25.39 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:40:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5a99335f05072708407be8d62c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:40:09 +0200 From: Martin Marinschek Reply-To: martin@marinschek.com To: MyFaces Discussion Subject: Re: MyFaces 1.0.9: how old? how stable? what's next? In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3309_6511426.1122478809541" References: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------=_Part_3309_6511426.1122478809541 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cool thing! regards, Martin On 7/27/05, Stan Silvert wrote: >=20 > For this release, we are not shipping tomahawk. We just ship > myfaces-impl.jar, myfaces-api.jar, and the needed third party jars. >=20 > I'd like to start shipping tomahawk at some point but I don't have > enough experience with that to support it right now. >=20 > Once cool thing is that the JSF standard taglibs are integrated with our > Tomcat container so that they are globally available. You can also add > your own tag libs to the shared TLD cache. This is something that is > talked about as an optional feature in the JSP 2.0 spec, but Tomcat > itself doesn't support it yet. >=20 > This puts JSF on the same level as Servlets and JSP's. You don't have > to worry about packaging it with your app. It is just there. >=20 > Stan Silvert > JBoss, Inc. > ssilvert@jboss.com > callto://stansilvert >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Sean Schofield [mailto:sean.schofield@gmail.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 11:18 AM > > To: MyFaces Discussion > > Subject: Re: MyFaces 1.0.9: how old? how stable? what's next? > > > > Stan, > > > > Will JBoss use the myfaces-all.jar or the individual jars > > (myfaces-api, myfaces-impl, tomahawk)? Or will tomahawk ship with > > JBoss at all? > > > > sean > > > > On 7/27/05, Stan Silvert wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd love to see a new release. I need some post 1.0.9 bug fixes for > the > > > MyFaces integration that we are doing for the JBoss 4.0.3 app > server. > > Right > > > now the version of MyFaces that is in our CVS is one that I had to > build > > > locally. It would be much better if we could ship a "blessed" > version > > of > > > MyFaces called 1.0.10. > > > > > > > > > > > > BTW, I'd love it if some of you could try out the JBoss/MyFaces > > integration. > > > You will need to build from CVS which is very easy to do. You just > do > > an > > > anonymous checkout and run build.bat or build.sh. > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.jboss.com/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=3DCVSRepository > > > > > > > > > > > > The detail for the integration is here: > > > > > > > > > > > > http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=3DJBossFaces > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stan Silvert > > > > > > JBoss, Inc. > > > > > > ssilvert@jboss.com > > > > > > callto://stansilvert > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > > > > From: Martin Marinschek [mailto:martin.marinschek@gmail.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 2:10 AM > > > To: MyFaces Discussion; MyFaces Development > > > Subject: Re: MyFaces 1.0.9: how old? how stable? what's next? > > > > > > > > > > > > Sounds cool... > > > > > > another thing is that I have suggested releasing a 1.0.10 (or a > 1.1) - > > > there has not been much feedback though on this. > > > > > > What's up, fellow committers, fancy a new release? > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > Martin > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/05, Richard Wallace wrote: > > > > > > MyFaces 1.0.9 jars are available at > > > http://www.bluesunrise.com/maven/. > > > Those are what I've been using. There was a short time where I did > put > > > jars up on a private server for my dev team because of a couple of > > > issues we were having with the released versions. I was just > hoping to > > > get something official setup. If the question is hosting it, I can > do > > > that. Hell, I could probably even setup a script to do an svn > update > > > and push snapshots out. I'll probably wind up doing that soon > anyways > > > on a private server. If there's enough interest I might as well go > > > ahead and make it public. > > > > > > Rich > > > > > > Sean Schofield wrote: > > > > > > >We should ask James Mitchell. He is a new committer to MyFaces > (he's > > > >a longtime committer on Struts.) He is constantly jabbering on > and on > > > >about Maven so he could probably answer that ;-) > > > > > > > >I'm not sure if a nightly build is warranted but I think we should > > > >have jars for the official release builds (starting with the 1.0.9 > > > >which has already been released.) > > > > > > > >Let see what James has to say ... > > > > > > > >sean > > > > > > > >On 7/26/05, Richard Wallace < rwallace@thewallacepack.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >>Any chance of getting a nightly snapshot in some maven repo > somewhere > > > >>for those of us using maven in our projects? > > > >> > > > >>Thanks, > > > >>Rich > > > >> > > > >>Sean Schofield wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>>I would suggest the nightly build as there have been many bug > fixes > > > >>>since the release. The timing of the next release is still up > in > > the > > > >>>air but this project is in rapid change mode at the moment so > IMO, > > you > > > >>>always want to be using the latest release even if its not yet > > > >>>official. > > > >>> > > > >>>sean > > > >>> > > > >>>On 7/26/05, Lindholm, Greg wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>>>I'm going to start a project with MyFaces. > > > >>>>Should I use the 1.0.9 build or grab the latest nightly build? > > > >>>>Have a lot of bugs been fixed since the release? > > > >>>>Are we getting close to a new release? > > > >>>> > > > >>>>Is MyFaces on a "Release soon Release often" strategy? > > > >>>> > > > >>>>I don't mind updating often, what I really hate is fighting > bugs > > that > > > >>>>have already been fixed. > > > >>>> > > > >>>>What are people using? > > > >>>> > > > >>>>Thanks > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > ------=_Part_3309_6511426.1122478809541 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cool thing!

regards,

Martin

On 7/27/05, Stan Silvert <stan.silvert@jboss.com> wrote:
For this release, we are not shipping tomahawk.  We just ship
= myfaces-impl.jar, myfaces-api.jar, and the needed third party jars.

= I'd like to start shipping tomahawk at some point but I don't have
enoug= h experience with that to support it right now.

Once cool thing is that the JSF standard taglibs are integrated wit= h our
Tomcat container so that they are globally available.  Y= ou can also add
your own tag libs to the shared TLD cache.  Th= is is something that is
talked about as an optional feature in the JSP 2.0 spec, but Tomcat
= itself doesn't support it yet.

This puts JSF on the same level as Se= rvlets and JSP's.  You don't have
to worry about packaging it = with your app.  It is just there.

Stan Silvert
JBoss, Inc.
ssilvert@jboss.com
callto://stans= ilvert

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean Schofi= eld [mailto: sean.schofield@gmail.com]> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 11:18 AM
> To: MyFaces Discussi= on
> Subject: Re: MyFaces 1.0.9: how old? how stable? what's next? >
> Stan,
>
> Will JBoss use the myfaces-all.jar or th= e individual jars
> (myfaces-api, myfaces-impl, tomahawk)?  = ;Or will tomahawk ship with
> JBoss at all?
>
> sean
&= gt;
> On 7/27/05, Stan Silvert <stan.silvert@jboss.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> &g= t;
> > +1
> >
> >
> >
> > I'd = love to see a new release.  I need some post=20 1.0.9 bug fixes for
the
> > MyFaces integration that we are doi= ng for the JBoss 4.0.3 app
server.
> Right
> > now the ve= rsion of MyFaces that is in our CVS is one that I had to
build
> &= gt; locally.  It would be much better if we could ship a "bl= essed"
version
> of
> > MyFaces called 1.0.10.
> >
= > >
> >
> > BTW, I'd love it if some of you could t= ry out the JBoss/MyFaces
> integration.
> >  You w= ill need to build from CVS which is very easy to do.  You just
do
> an
> > anonymous checkout and run build.bat or buil= d.sh.
> >
> >
> >
> > http://www.jboss.com/wik= i/Wiki.jsp?page=3DCVSRepository
> >
> >
> >
> > The detail for the= integration is here:
> >
> >
> >
> > <= a href=3D"http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=3DJBossFaces">http://wik= i.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=3DJBossFaces
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Stan = Silvert
> >
> > JBoss, Inc.
> >
> > ssilvert@jboss.com
> >
> > callto://stansilvert
>= >
> >
> >  ________________________________=
> >
> >
> > From: Martin Marinschek [mailto: martin.marinschek@gmail.com]
> >  Sent: Wednesday, J= uly 27, 2005 2:10 AM
> >  To: MyFaces Discussion; MyFace= s Development
> >  Subject: Re: MyFaces 1.0.9: how old? = how stable? what's next?
> >
> >
> >
> > Sounds cool...
> >= ;
> >  another thing is that I have suggested releasing = a 1.0.10 (or a
1.1) -
> > there has not been much feedback thou= gh on this.
> >
> >  What's up, fellow committers, fancy a= new release?
> >
> >  regards,
> >> >  Martin
> >
> >
> >
>= > On 7/27/05, Richard Wallace < rwallace@thewallacepack.net<= /a>> wrote:
> >
> > MyFaces 1.0.9 jars are available a= t
> > http://www.blu= esunrise.com/maven/ .
> >  Those are what I've been using.  Th= ere was a short time where I did
put
> >  jars up on = a private server for my dev team because of a couple of
> > &= nbsp;issues we were having with the released versions.  I was jus= t
hoping to
> >  get something official setup. &n= bsp;If the question is hosting it, I can
do
> >  that= .  Hell, I could probably even setup a script to do an svn
upd= ate
> >  and push snapshots out.  I'll probabl= y wind up doing that soon
anyways
> >  on a private server.  If ther= e's enough interest I might as well go
> >  ahead and ma= ke it public.
> >
> >  Rich
> >
>= ; >  Sean Schofield wrote:
> >
> >  >We should ask James Mitchell.  He is= a new committer to MyFaces
(he's
> >  >a longtime= committer on Struts.)  He is constantly jabbering on
and on> >  >about Maven so he could probably answer that ;-)
> >  >
> >  >I'm not sure if a= nightly build is warranted but I think we should
> >  &= gt;have jars for the official release builds (starting with the 1.0.9
&g= t; >  >which has already been released.)
> >  >
> >  >Let see what Jame= s has to say ...
> >  >
> >  >s= ean
> >  >
> >  >On 7/26/05, Ri= chard Wallace < rwallace@thewallacepack.net> wrote:
> >  >
= > >  >
> >  >>Any chance of get= ting a nightly snapshot in some maven repo
somewhere
> > &= nbsp;>>for those of us using maven in our projects?
> >  >>
> >  >>Thanks,> >  >>Rich
> >  >>
>= ; >  >>Sean Schofield wrote:
> >  >= ;>
> >  >>
> >  >>
= > >  >>>I would suggest the nightly build as there= have been many bug
fixes
> >  >>>since the release.  = ;The timing of the next release is still up
in
> the
> >&= nbsp; >>>air but this project is in rapid change mode at the = moment so
IMO,
> you
> >  >>>always want to be using the latest rel= ease even if its not yet
> >  >>>official.
&= gt; >  >>>
> >  >>>sean> >  >>>
> >  >>>On = 7/26/05, Lindholm, Greg < glindholm@neom.com> wrote:
= > >  >>>
> >  >>>
&= gt; >  >>>
> >  >>>
&g= t; >  >>>>I'm going to start a project with MyFace= s.
> >  >>>>Should I use the 1.0.9 build or gr= ab the latest nightly build?
> >  >>>>Have a= lot of bugs been fixed since the release?
> >  >>= >>Are we getting close to a new release?
> >  >>>>
> >  >>&= gt;>Is MyFaces on a "Release soon Release often" strategy?
= > >  >>>>
> >  >>>&= gt;I don't mind updating often, what I really hate is fighting
bugs
> that
> >  >>>>have already = been fixed.
> >  >>>>
> > &nbs= p;>>>>What are people using?
> >  >>&g= t;>
> >  >>>>Thanks
> >  >>>>
> >  >>&= gt;>
> >  >>>>
> >  &g= t;>>>
> >  >>>>
> > &= nbsp;>>>>
> >  >>
> > &n= bsp;>>
> >
> >

------=_Part_3309_6511426.1122478809541--