myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dora Rajappan <dorarajap...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: Migrate all MyFaces projects to Git
Date Fri, 28 Jul 2017 09:04:45 GMT
mojarra download url of github.com is also mirror and it actually goes to java.net domain.https://maven.java.net/content/repositories/releases/org/glassfish/javax.faces/2.3.2/


On Friday, July 28, 2017, 2:22:03 PM GMT+5:30, Dora Rajappan <dorarajappan@yahoo.com>
wrote:

Hi ,
 Thanks for the information on Git hub for apache. I found mojarra latest downloads in github.com
and understand the domain is a trusted site from this discussion. https://github.com/javaserverfaces/mojarra/releases/tag/2.3.2. 
  
Nice to know myfaces projects are going to apache git. I can find the myfaces mirrors already
in github.com!
Thanks & Regards,Dora Rajappan,9986201824.


On Thursday, July 27, 2017, 9:03:55 PM GMT+5:30, Bernd Bohmann <bernd.bohmann@googlemail.com>
wrote:

Hello Dora
this is not possible for apache projects
see: https://git-wip-us.apache.org

and
https://www.apache.org/dev/writable-git

but there are readonly mirrors at https://github.com/apache
Regards
Bernd
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Dora Rajappan <dorarajappan@yahoo.com> wrote:

Is it github.com where you are going to migrate myfaces to?

On Thursday, July 27, 2017, 7:06:06 PM GMT+5:30, Bernd Bohmann <bernd.bohmann@googlemail.com>
wrote:

for Trinidad as well
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Udo Schnurpfeil <lofwyr@apache.org> wrote:

Hi,

for Tobago I think, we can do it now!

Regards,

Udo

Am 27.07.17 um 13:03 schrieb Bernd Bohmann:
> Ok
>
> we have some agreement about moving to git.
> Now we should define some time line.
> Any suggestions from the active subprojects?
>
> Something like
> 'I would like to move to git after blah blah release'
> 'I would like to move now'
> 'I would like to move in 2 weeks'
> or whatever
>
> I can support the migration to git.
>
> Regards
>
> Bernd
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Kito Mann <kito.mann@virtua.com
> <mailto:kito.mann@virtua.com>> wrote:
>
>     Ah, this may be why it's worked for me -- smaller projects with
>     defined release cycles.
>
>     Anyway, I never meant to imply that git == git flow. We will need
>     some sort of process, though, and the DeltaSpike one seems like a
>     good place to start.
>
>     ___
>
>     Kito D. Mann | @kito99 | Author, JSF in Action
>     Web Components, Polymer, JSF, PrimeFaces, Java EE training and
>     consulting
>     Virtua, Inc. | virtua.tech
>     JSFCentral.com | @jsfcentral | knowesis.io <http://knowesis.io> -
>     fresh Web Components info
>     +1 203-998-0403 <tel:(203)%20998-0403>
>
>     * See me speak at the ng-conf April 5th-8th: http://bit.ly/2mw7HBj
>     <http://bit.ly/2kr0fWI>
>     * Listen to the Enterprise Java Newscast: http://enterprisejavanews.com
>
>
>     On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de
>     <mailto:struberg@yahoo.de>> wrote:
>
>         gitflow is pure pita ;)
>         It basically only works for companies where you have a single
>         manager who decides what goes in and what not.
>
>         But GIT != gitflow. gitflow has nothing to do with the GIT scm
>         itself, but is just a fancy name for a development process with
>         an explicit build-branch and a build-master.
>
>         +0 on moving to GIT.
>         SVN works good enough imo, but GIT ofc also would work.
>
>         LIeGrue,
>         strub
>
>         > Am 19.04.2017 um 12:57 schrieb Kito Mann <kito.mann@virtua.com
>         <mailto:kito.mann@virtua.com> > :
>         >
>         > +1
>         >
>         > Wha's wrong with GitFlow?
>         >
>         > ___
>         >
>         > Kito D. Mann | @kito99 | Author, JSF in Action
>         > Web Components, Polymer, JSF, PrimeFaces, Java EE training and
>         consulting
>         > Virtua, Inc. | virtua.tech
>         > JSFCentral.com | @jsfcentral | knowesis.io
>         <http://knowesis.io> - fresh Web Components info
>         > +1 203-998-0403 <tel:%2B1%20203-998-0403>
>         >
>         > * See me speak at the ng-conf April 5th-8th: http://bit.ly/2mw7HBj
>         > * Listen to the Enterprise Java Newscast:
>         http://enterprisejavanews.com
>         >
>         >
>         > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Bernd Bohmann
>         <bernd.bohmann@googlemail.com
>         <mailto:bernd.bohmann@ googlemail.com>> wrote:
>         > Hello
>         >
>         > I think the changes will be not so complicated. The deltaspike
>         pom looks nice :-)
>         > If someone talks about git-flow process i'm out.
>         >
>         > Regards
>         >
>         > Bernd
>         >
>         > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:28 AM, Leonardo Uribe
>         <lu4242@gmail.com <mailto:lu4242@gmail.com>> wrote:
>         > +1
>         >
>         > Change the release process is a pain, but I agree there are
>         some benefits moving to git.
>         >
>         > But when I see here:
>         >
>         > https://github.com/apache/ myfaces
>         <https://github.com/apache/ myfaces>
>         >
>         > It says:
>         >
>         > mirrored from git://git.apache.org/myfaces. git
>         <http://git.apache.org/ myfaces.git>
>         >
>         > But I have never checked where that file is or how to change it.
>         >
>         > Looking in deltaspike, the svn repo only has the site (for the
>         CMS) and the source code lives on git. If that so, we still need
>         the svn, so I agree it is a good idea to move only some
>         subprojects to git.
>         >
>         > regards,
>         >
>         > Leonardo Uribe
>         >
>         >
>         >       Virus-free. www.avast.com <http://www.avast.com>
>         >
>         > 2017-04-17 11:40 GMT-05:00 Grant Smith <work.grant@gmail.com
>         <mailto:work.grant@gmail.com> > :
>         > +1
>         >
>         > Couldn't agree more.
>         >
>         > Grant Smith - V.P. Information Technology
>         > Marathon Computer Systems, LLC.
>         >
>         > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 2:39 AM, Bernd Bohmann
>         <bernd.bohmann@atanion.com <mailto:bernd.bohmann@atanion. com>>
>         wrote:
>         > From my side a big
>         >
>         > +1
>         >
>         > I'm still happy with subversion but for others the
>         collaboration is easier and the project visibility a little bit
>         better.
>         >
>         > Regards
>         >
>         > Bernd
>         >
>         > Am 13.04.2017 09:41 schrieb "Thomas Andraschko"
>         <andraschko.thomas@gmail.com <mailto:andraschko.thomas@ gmail.com>>:
>         > +0
>         > I usually just work on MF core and there it doesn't make much
>         difference.
>         >
>         > 2017-04-13 8:57 GMT+02:00 Dennis Kieselhorst <mail@dekies.de
>         <mailto:mail@dekies.de>>:
>         > Hi,
>         >
>         > have you ever thought of migrating to Git? I see more and more
>         Apache
>         > projects moving. In the past SVN or Git didn't make any
>         difference to me
>         > but now I'm thinking that as an Open Source project you need to be
>         > present on GitHub to get Pull Requests from the community.
>         It's much
>         > more fun contributing there than attaching patches to JIRA issues.
>         >
>         > We could start with Trinidad and Tobago to avoid conflicts
>         with the 2.3
>         > release.
>         >
>         > Cheers
>         > Dennis
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>
>
>





Mime
View raw message