Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C02F200C5C for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 11:39:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 6A7B8160B91; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 09:39:07 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F1F0160B9F for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 11:39:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 50497 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2017 09:39:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "MyFaces Development" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 50392 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2017 09:39:03 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 09:39:03 +0000 Received: from mail-io0-f169.google.com (mail-io0-f169.google.com [209.85.223.169]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 320EC1A0321 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 09:39:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f169.google.com with SMTP id o22so67559858iod.3 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 02:39:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/4ado+JNZ8MV2MviOEIUVdctSLoo44qD93wEjTjwlDcVCzVBVY4 2D5xDGrMLSsX4SRvUlqWi4CVHUBuiA== X-Received: by 10.107.85.6 with SMTP id j6mr8983622iob.165.1492681142502; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 02:39:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.79.162.216 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 02:38:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <0718c5cd-81a7-135d-a212-b13810bf355f@dekies.de> From: Gerhard Petracek Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 11:38:41 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Migrate all MyFaces projects to Git To: MyFaces Development Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c1b7cce4310cd054d95e9b6 archived-at: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 09:39:07 -0000 --94eb2c1b7cce4310cd054d95e9b6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 hi @ all, just fyi: [1] works very well for ds since the beginning. regards, gerhard [1] https://deltaspike.apache.org/suggested-git-workflows.html 2017-04-19 14:45 GMT+02:00 Kito Mann : > Hello Bernd, > > I like GitFlow for coordinating with multiple developers. However, if > everyone is sending pull requests anyway, it's not quite as useful. It > makes sense when you have multiple developers that are committing to a > "develop" branch and provides guidelines for working with master for new > releases and hot fixes. > > ___ > > Kito D. Mann | @kito99 | Author, JSF in Action > Web Components, Polymer, JSF, PrimeFaces, Java EE training and consulting > Virtua, Inc. | virtua.tech > JSFCentral.com | @jsfcentral | knowesis.io - fresh Web Components info > +1 203-998-0403 <(203)%20998-0403> > > * See me speak at the ng-conf April 5th-8th: http://bit.ly/2mw7HBj > > * Listen to the Enterprise Java Newscast: http://enterprisejavanews.com > > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Bernd Bohmann < > bernd.bohmann@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Until now, nobody could explain me the real technical improvement of >> GitFlow. >> We are talking about using git and not GitFlow. Git does not require >> GitFlow >> >> At Apache we are only using process as much as needed and not as possible! >> And my personal advice is: >> Start with a model as simple as possible. >> >> Regards >> >> Bernd >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Kito Mann wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> Wha's wrong with GitFlow? >>> >>> ___ >>> >>> Kito D. Mann | @kito99 | Author, JSF in Action >>> Web Components, Polymer, JSF, PrimeFaces, Java EE training and consulting >>> Virtua, Inc. | virtua.tech >>> JSFCentral.com | @jsfcentral | knowesis.io - fresh Web Components info >>> +1 203-998-0403 <(203)%20998-0403> >>> >>> * See me speak at the ng-conf April 5th-8th: http://bit.ly/2mw7HBj >>> >>> * Listen to the Enterprise Java Newscast: http://enterprisejavanews.com >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Bernd Bohmann < >>> bernd.bohmann@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello >>>> >>>> I think the changes will be not so complicated. The deltaspike pom >>>> looks nice :-) >>>> If someone talks about git-flow process i'm out. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> Bernd >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:28 AM, Leonardo Uribe >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> Change the release process is a pain, but I agree there are some >>>>> benefits moving to git. >>>>> >>>>> But when I see here: >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/myfaces >>>>> >>>>> It says: >>>>> >>>>> mirrored from git://git.apache.org/myfaces.git >>>>> >>>>> But I have never checked where that file is or how to change it. >>>>> >>>>> Looking in deltaspike, the svn repo only has the site (for the CMS) >>>>> and the source code lives on git. If that so, we still need the svn, so I >>>>> agree it is a good idea to move only some subprojects to git. >>>>> >>>>> regards, >>>>> >>>>> Leonardo Uribe >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Virus-free. >>>>> www.avast.com >>>>> >>>>> <#m_-6826021186946778376_m_-135240448576325838_m_-1665615671155989291_m_312095376341812428_m_228356912083513587_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> >>>>> >>>>> 2017-04-17 11:40 GMT-05:00 Grant Smith : >>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Couldn't agree more. >>>>>> >>>>>> Grant Smith - V.P. Information Technology >>>>>> Marathon Computer Systems, LLC. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 2:39 AM, Bernd Bohmann < >>>>>> bernd.bohmann@atanion.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> From my side a big >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm still happy with subversion but for others the collaboration is >>>>>>> easier and the project visibility a little bit better. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bernd >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Am 13.04.2017 09:41 schrieb "Thomas Andraschko" < >>>>>>> andraschko.thomas@gmail.com>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +0 >>>>>>>> I usually just work on MF core and there it doesn't make much >>>>>>>> difference. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2017-04-13 8:57 GMT+02:00 Dennis Kieselhorst : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> have you ever thought of migrating to Git? I see more and more >>>>>>>>> Apache >>>>>>>>> projects moving. In the past SVN or Git didn't make any difference >>>>>>>>> to me >>>>>>>>> but now I'm thinking that as an Open Source project you need to be >>>>>>>>> present on GitHub to get Pull Requests from the community. It's >>>>>>>>> much >>>>>>>>> more fun contributing there than attaching patches to JIRA issues. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We could start with Trinidad and Tobago to avoid conflicts with >>>>>>>>> the 2.3 >>>>>>>>> release. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>>> Dennis >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > --94eb2c1b7cce4310cd054d95e9b6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
hi @ all,

just fyi:
[1] works very well= for ds since the beginning.

regards,
ge= rhard



2017-04-19 14:45 GMT+02:00 Kito Mann = <kito.mann@virtua.com>:
Hello Bernd,

I like= GitFlow for coordinating with multiple developers. However, if everyone is= sending pull requests anyway, it's not quite as useful. It makes sense= when you have multiple developers that are committing to a "develop&q= uot; branch and provides guidelines for working with master for new release= s and hot fixes.

___

Kito D. Mann | @kito99 |= Author, JSF in Action
Web Components, Polymer, JSF, PrimeFaces, = Java EE training and consulting
Virtua, Inc. | virtua.tech=C2=A0<= /div>
JSFCentral.com | @jsfcentral | knowesis.io - fresh Web Components info

* See me speak at the ng-conf April 5= th-8th: http://bit.ly/2= mw7HBj
* Listen to the Enterprise Java Newscast: http://enterprisejavanews.c= om

=

On Wed, = Apr 19, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Bernd Bohmann <bernd.bohmann@googlemai= l.com> wrote:
Until now, nobody could explain me the real technica= l improvement of GitFlow.=C2=A0
We are talking about using git and not = GitFlow. Git does not require GitFlow=C2=A0

At Apa= che we are only using process as much as needed and not as possible!
<= div>And my personal advice is:
Start with a model as simple as po= ssible.

Regards

Bernd

=C2=A0


= =C2=A0


On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at = 12:57 PM, Kito Mann <kito.mann@virtua.com> wrote:
+1

<= /div>
Wha's wrong with GitFlow?

=
___

Kito D. Mann | @kito99 | Author, JSF in Action
= Web Components, Polymer, JSF, PrimeFaces, Java EE training and consulting
Virtua, Inc. | virtua.tech=C2=A0
JSFCentral.com | @jsfce= ntral | knowesis.io - = fresh Web Components info

* See me speak at the ng-conf April 5th-8th: http://bit.ly/2mw7HBj
* Listen to= the Enterprise Java Newscast: http://enterprisejavanews.com


On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Bernd Bohma= nn <bernd.bohmann@googlemail.com> wrote:
Hello
I think the changes will be not so complicated. The deltaspike = pom looks nice :-)=C2=A0
If someone talks about git-flow process = i'm out.

Regards

Bernd

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:28 AM, Leonardo Uribe <lu4242@gmail.co= m> wrote:
+1

Change the rele= ase process is a pain, but I agree there are some benefits moving to git.
But when I see here:

https://github.com/apache/myfaces

It says:

mirrored from git://git.apache.org/myfaces.git

But I have never checked where that file is or how = to change it.

Looking in deltaspike, the svn r= epo only has the site (for the CMS) and the source code lives on git. If th= at so, we still need the svn, so I agree it is a good idea to move only som= e subprojects to git.

regards,

Leonar= do Uribe


Virus-free. www.avast.com

2017-04-17 11:40 GMT-05:00 Grant S= mith <work.grant@gmail.com>:
+1=C2=A0

Cou= ldn't agree more.

Grant Smith - V.P. Information Technology
Marathon C= omputer Systems, LLC.

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 2:39 AM, Bernd Bohma= nn <bernd.bohmann@atanion.com> wrote:
From my side a big=

+1
I'm still happy with subversion but for others= the collaboration is easier and the project visibility a little bit better= .

Regards

Bernd

Am 13.04.2017 09:41 schrieb "Thomas Andraschko" <andraschko.thomas= @gmail.com>:
+0
I usually just wo= rk on MF core and there it doesn't make much difference.

2017-04-13 8:57 = GMT+02:00 Dennis Kieselhorst <mail@dekies.de>:
Hi,

have you ever thought of migrating to Git? I see more and more Apache
projects moving. In the past SVN or Git didn't make any difference to m= e
but now I'm thinking that as an Open Source project you need to be
present on GitHub to get Pull Requests from the community. It's much more fun contributing there than attaching patches to JIRA issues.

We could start with Trinidad and Tobago to avoid conflicts with the 2.3
release.

Cheers
Denn= is








--94eb2c1b7cce4310cd054d95e9b6--