myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gerhard Petracek <gpetra...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Migrate all MyFaces projects to Git
Date Thu, 20 Apr 2017 09:38:41 GMT
hi @ all,

just fyi:
[1] works very well for ds since the beginning.

regards,
gerhard

[1] https://deltaspike.apache.org/suggested-git-workflows.html



2017-04-19 14:45 GMT+02:00 Kito Mann <kito.mann@virtua.com>:

> Hello Bernd,
>
> I like GitFlow for coordinating with multiple developers. However, if
> everyone is sending pull requests anyway, it's not quite as useful. It
> makes sense when you have multiple developers that are committing to a
> "develop" branch and provides guidelines for working with master for new
> releases and hot fixes.
>
> ___
>
> Kito D. Mann | @kito99 | Author, JSF in Action
> Web Components, Polymer, JSF, PrimeFaces, Java EE training and consulting
> Virtua, Inc. | virtua.tech
> JSFCentral.com | @jsfcentral | knowesis.io - fresh Web Components info
> +1 203-998-0403 <(203)%20998-0403>
>
> * See me speak at the ng-conf April 5th-8th: http://bit.ly/2mw7HBj
> <http://bit.ly/2kr0fWI>
> * Listen to the Enterprise Java Newscast: http://enterprisejavanews.com
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Bernd Bohmann <
> bernd.bohmann@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> Until now, nobody could explain me the real technical improvement of
>> GitFlow.
>> We are talking about using git and not GitFlow. Git does not require
>> GitFlow
>>
>> At Apache we are only using process as much as needed and not as possible!
>> And my personal advice is:
>> Start with a model as simple as possible.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Bernd
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Kito Mann <kito.mann@virtua.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Wha's wrong with GitFlow?
>>>
>>> ___
>>>
>>> Kito D. Mann | @kito99 | Author, JSF in Action
>>> Web Components, Polymer, JSF, PrimeFaces, Java EE training and consulting
>>> Virtua, Inc. | virtua.tech
>>> JSFCentral.com | @jsfcentral | knowesis.io - fresh Web Components info
>>> +1 203-998-0403 <(203)%20998-0403>
>>>
>>> * See me speak at the ng-conf April 5th-8th: http://bit.ly/2mw7HBj
>>> <http://bit.ly/2kr0fWI>
>>> * Listen to the Enterprise Java Newscast: http://enterprisejavanews.com
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Bernd Bohmann <
>>> bernd.bohmann@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello
>>>>
>>>> I think the changes will be not so complicated. The deltaspike pom
>>>> looks nice :-)
>>>> If someone talks about git-flow process i'm out.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> Bernd
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:28 AM, Leonardo Uribe <lu4242@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> Change the release process is a pain, but I agree there are some
>>>>> benefits moving to git.
>>>>>
>>>>> But when I see here:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/myfaces
>>>>>
>>>>> It says:
>>>>>
>>>>> mirrored from git://git.apache.org/myfaces.git
>>>>>
>>>>> But I have never checked where that file is or how to change it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Looking in deltaspike, the svn repo only has the site (for the CMS)
>>>>> and the source code lives on git. If that so, we still need the svn,
so I
>>>>> agree it is a good idea to move only some subprojects to git.
>>>>>
>>>>> regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Leonardo Uribe
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Virus-free.
>>>>> www.avast.com
>>>>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
>>>>> <#m_-6826021186946778376_m_-135240448576325838_m_-1665615671155989291_m_312095376341812428_m_228356912083513587_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2017-04-17 11:40 GMT-05:00 Grant Smith <work.grant@gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Couldn't agree more.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Grant Smith - V.P. Information Technology
>>>>>> Marathon Computer Systems, LLC.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 2:39 AM, Bernd Bohmann <
>>>>>> bernd.bohmann@atanion.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From my side a big
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm still happy with subversion but for others the collaboration
is
>>>>>>> easier and the project visibility a little bit better.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bernd
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 13.04.2017 09:41 schrieb "Thomas Andraschko" <
>>>>>>> andraschko.thomas@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +0
>>>>>>>> I usually just work on MF core and there it doesn't make
much
>>>>>>>> difference.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2017-04-13 8:57 GMT+02:00 Dennis Kieselhorst <mail@dekies.de>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> have you ever thought of migrating to Git? I see more
and more
>>>>>>>>> Apache
>>>>>>>>> projects moving. In the past SVN or Git didn't make any
difference
>>>>>>>>> to me
>>>>>>>>> but now I'm thinking that as an Open Source project you
need to be
>>>>>>>>> present on GitHub to get Pull Requests from the community.
It's
>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>> more fun contributing there than attaching patches to
JIRA issues.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We could start with Trinidad and Tobago to avoid conflicts
with
>>>>>>>>> the 2.3
>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>> Dennis
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message