myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] trinidad.next
Date Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:59:18 GMT
hi scott,

yes - that isn't a big issue (even though the reason for it is quite
questionable, if you consider the changes in jsf 2.1).
however, i'm more concerned about the implication of the topics i mentioned
earlier.

regards,
gerhard

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF/JavaEE powerhouse -
JavaEE Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces



2013/10/30 Scott O'Bryan <darkarena@gmail.com>

> Hey guys, I understand some of the frustration, but MyFaces 2.1 and
> Trinidad 2.0 is an invalid configuration.  Why would a release of Trinidad
> 2.1 (which is designed for JSF 2.1) not solve this issue.
>  --
> Scott O'Bryan
> Sent with Airmail <http://airmailapp.com/tracking>
>
> On October 30, 2013 at 1:28:20 AM, Gerhard Petracek (
> gerhard.petracek@gmail.com <//gerhard.petracek@gmail.com>) wrote:
>
>  hi eduardo,
>
> if so: please file the corresponding jira-ticket/s.
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF/JavaEE powerhouse -
> JavaEE Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
>
>
> 2013/10/30 Contrib <gcontrib@cibinetonline.com>
>
>>  There are some bugfixes on MyFaces 2.1, and projects having Trinidad
>> 2.0 as part of the stack, cannot update it due this.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Eduardo
>>
>> El 28/10/13 10:09, Gerhard Petracek escribió:
>>
>>    it isn't only about one release.
>> e.g. 2.1.0 was just skipped and at least a part is broken since months
>> (see [1] and [2]).
>> therefore i called this thread "trinidad.next" instead of "trinidad
>> 2.1.1".
>>
>> imo:
>> the current situation isn't acceptable for users.
>> committers who work on trinidad on a regular basis should also do
>> releases on a regular basis.
>>
>> regards,
>> gerhard
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2422
>> [2] https://builds.apache.org/job/Trinidad%20Core%20Trunk%20(snapshot)/<https://builds.apache.org/job/Trinidad%20Core%20Trunk%20%28snapshot%29/>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2013/10/18 Hazem Saleh <hazems@apache.org>
>>
>>> +1 for a release too.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Werner Punz <werner.punz@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Am 17.10.13 22:47, schrieb Gerhard Petracek:
>>>>
>>>>  hi @ all,
>>>>>
>>>>> we haven't seen a trinidad release for almost >20 months<.
>>>>> it's known that other projects are based on trinidad and therefore it's
>>>>> obvious that they have to use snapshot versions.
>>>>>
>>>>> imo:
>>>>> since there are commits on a regular basis, there should be also
>>>>> releases on a regular basis.
>>>>>
>>>>> regards,
>>>>> gerhard
>>>>>
>>>>  +1 for a release
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Werner
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>> Hazem Saleh
>>>
>>> Author of JavaScript Unit Testing book:
>>> http://www.amazon.com/dp/1782160620/
>>>
>>> Co-author of (The Definitive Guide to Apache MyFaces and Facelets) book:
>>> http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B002M052KY
>>>
>>> DeveloperWorks Contributing Author
>>>
>>> https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/hazem/entry/ibm_developerworks_contributing_author?lang=en_us
>>>
>>> An Apache committer, IBMer, and a technical speaker
>>>
>>> Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/hazems
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message