myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE][core] fix for MYFACES-3586 (performance of resources in jar files served by ResourceHandlerImpl)
Date Tue, 27 Nov 2012 15:56:01 GMT
+1, if there are people with interest to get a problem solved,
     it's worth a shot to hear what people says and get it done.


2012/11/27 Leonardo Uribe <lu4242@gmail.com>:
> Hi
>
> Some time ago, it was mentioned the controversy behind a fix
> for MYFACES-3586
>
> http://markmail.org/message/xycbf77ku7x5wygj#query:+page:1+mid:jhmcr6a435xma3lu+state:results
>
> Maybe we should reconsider the previous position about this
> one and try to fix it, even if that means to include additional web
> config params, even if exists better solutions for this one or
> even if suppose more work to do.
>
> The reason why we should change our position is users start to
> fall on the same hole over and over again. Given the interest on
> the problem, it starts to sound better to provide an alternate fix
> bundled in myfaces core instead say to the people "... setup a
> load balancer in front of your server and cache the resources
> there to fix your problem ...".
>
> Things become a ridiculousness, when you find a similar problem:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3656
> ViewScoped bean fails when SERIALIZE_STATE_IN_SESSION is set to true
>
> Both problems are similar because:
>
> 1. Both problems has a known solution.
> 2. The solution is not perfect / cannot be enabled by default / there are
>     better alternatives
> 3. The typical answer is say "... woops ... try this alternative strategy and
>     try to live with the problem ..."
>
> Given the latest feedback about MYFACES-3586 and MYFACES-3656,
> I think it is desirable to take a look and revote a solution to this problem
> again.
>
> Please vote:
>
> +1 if you consider we need to fix this one once for all.
> +0 if you don't care about
> -1  if you consider do nothing is better and why
>
> Note we need minimum 3 +1 votes to support this initiative and override
> the previous decision of the community.
>
> regards,
>
> Leonardo Uribe

Mime
View raw message