myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Grant Smith <work.gr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Trinidad 2.0.1 (try 2)
Date Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:22:06 GMT
+1

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Matt Cooper <mcooper@apache.org> wrote:

> +1
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Blake Sullivan <blake.sullivan@oracle.com
> > wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> -- Blake Sullivan
>>
>> On Feb 25, 2012, at 3:36 AM, Andy Schwartz wrote:
>>
>> +1.
>>
>> Thanks for putting this together Scott.
>>
>> Andy
>>
>> On Feb 24, 2012, at 12:30 PM, Scott O'Bryan <darkarena@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.1 release out and
>> now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not.  I have
>> committed most of the most recent submitted patches and things look to be
>> fairly stable.  There are a few patches outstanding, but I wanted to put
>> those into trunk so that they can get some more testing.
>>
>> This is a very big release with many bug fixes and quite a few fixes to
>> support the MyFaces checkstyle audits.  You will notice the absence of the
>> "component showcase" example module.  It was decided to remove this module
>> because it contains code brought in by Maven which is NOT under the Apache
>> license.  The component showcase **IS** available by building the source
>> manually.
>>
>> The last vote was vetoed because some files were missing licenses and
>> there were some references to external repositories.  The new staging
>> repositories contain fixes for all of these issues including an enhancement
>> to the base POM file which will automatically run the rat verifications at
>> build to prevent the licensing issues in the future.
>>
>> At this time, I would like to ask for a vote, once again, on this
>> release.  All of the following should be ready for review:
>>
>> * The generated repository and assembly artifacts [1]
>> * The generated source archive [2]
>> * The updated svn repository [3]
>>
>> Please review the artifacts and vote according to the following:
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------
>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
>>  and why..............
>> ------------------------------------------------
>>
>> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>   Scott O'Bryan
>>
>> [1]
>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-067
>> [2]
>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.1/trinidad-2.0.1-source-release.zip>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-067/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.1/trinidad-2.0.1-source-release.zip
>> [3]
>> <https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-2.0.1/>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-2.0.1/
>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
Grant Smith - V.P. Information Technology
Marathon Computer Systems, LLC.

Mime
View raw message