Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6C9B73AD for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 09:25:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22330 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2011 09:25:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 22233 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2011 09:25:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "MyFaces Development" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 22226 invoked by uid 99); 1 Nov 2011 09:25:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 09:25:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gerhard.petracek@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.53 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.53] (HELO mail-yw0-f53.google.com) (209.85.213.53) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 09:25:43 +0000 Received: by ywe9 with SMTP id 9so6793240ywe.12 for ; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 02:25:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nWvXRdkqBekHBAmt0XmVe555Oof1YoXumHPhRR5Tcsc=; b=MffEWyQbf1fdmsCeAV0QojlP5BAqobt97RVNg/fMAOcmvoTzgwYAOgpL+mmE1yUoMJ ZFVJL6nEXfIVANsVI1ue6jGSAEIk07Ccfy03WIpE0PrdAZvYkucMmejzUbWdYpy/iLQk VnElv7EkMnS6qECFdxSV8YQMtoKBK15asB66o= Received: by 10.236.138.47 with SMTP id z35mr20851271yhi.56.1320139523149; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 02:25:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.95.135 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 02:25:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Gerhard Petracek Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 10:25:02 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Internal Incubator To: MyFaces Development Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org hi bart, as mentioned [1] by mark it's also about ip=A0clearance [2]. regards, gerhard [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/myfaces-dev/201110.mbox/%3C131= 9274310.93350.YahooMailNeo@web27807.mail.ukl.yahoo.com%3E [2] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2011/11/1 Bart Kummel > > +1 for the idea! > I agree with Bernd about the name. For me, "incubator" is also associated= with rules and legal stuff. We should encourage people to contribute, inst= ead of scaring them away. "Sandbox" or "labs" sounds encouraging and access= ible. But perhaps we should discuss/vote the name in another thread and fir= st focus on the idea... > Best regards, > Bart Kummel > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 01:36, Gerhard Petracek wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> in order to check if there is a community for a new sub-project (esp. >> GSoC projects for MyFaces), we discussed [1] the introduction of an >> internal incubator. >> We would release such projects early and e.g. after a quarter we >> decide if we keep and promote a project (as a sub-project or a module >> of an existing sub-project) or if we drop it. >> >> Please vote: >> >> [+1] I like the idea >> [0] I'm not convinced but I'm ok with it >> [-1] I don't agree >> >> Regards, >> Gerhard >> >> [1] http://markmail.org/message/d7oogfabvliwn7fg >