myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Scott O'Bryan <darkar...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [TRINIDAD] Some status
Date Mon, 14 Nov 2011 23:48:31 GMT
Glauco,

There you go, nailing me with this issue again..  :D  Nearest I can 
tell, we don't have a fix.  I'm going to expedite this with Gary to see 
if he can come up with one. In the mean time, is there a problem with 
using Trinidad components in the dialog?

Thanks,
   Scott

On 11/14/2011 03:56 PM, Glauco P. Gomes wrote:
> Any chance to fix TRINIDAD-1813 in this next release?
>
> Sorry for the offtopic.
>
> Glauco P. Gomes
>
> Em 14-11-2011 19:51, Gerhard Petracek escreveu:
>> +1
>>
>> regards,
>> gerhard
>>
>> http://www.irian.at
>>
>> Your JSF powerhouse -
>> JSF Consulting, Development and
>> Courses in English and German
>>
>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>>
>>
>>
>> 2011/11/14 Mark Struberg<struberg@yahoo.de>:
>>> +1 from me also. Sounds like a very good plan.
>>>
>>> LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: Leonardo Uribe<lu4242@gmail.com>
>>>> To: MyFaces Development<dev@myfaces.apache.org>
>>>> Cc:
>>>> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 10:22 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [TRINIDAD] Some status
>>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> +1, sounds good. Maybe we should think about use other code highlight
>>>> library with a license compatible with apache, but make a release
>>>> comes first, so this should not be an stopper for that.
>>>>
>>>> regards,
>>>>
>>>> Leonardo Uribe
>>>>
>>>> 2011/11/14 Scott O'Bryan<darkarena@gmail.com>:
>>>>>   Okay everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>>   In case you were wondering of the status of Trinidad, here's where
we
>>>> are
>>>>>   at.  There have been some major hurdles with JSF 2.0 and 2.1 that we
have
>>>>>   been cleaning up (and my schedule has been tight as a result).  Furthermore
>>>>>   we had a licensing issue with the Component Showcase which prevented
the
>>>>>   release of Trinidad 2.0.1.
>>>>>
>>>>>   So I'm going to try to get a release out this week and here is what
I
>>>>>   propose:
>>>>>
>>>>>   1. I'm going to disable the Component Showcase from being distributed
>>>> as
>>>>>   part of our builds.  It will still be available in the source, but
not as a
>>>>>   distributable.  This will prevent us from distributing stuff with the
LGPL
>>>>>   liscense (thanks for catching this guys).
>>>>>
>>>>>   2. I'm going to sync up the Trinidad 2.0.1 tag with what's
>>>> currently in
>>>>>   Trunk.  A lot of high priority issues came in and were fixed shortly
after
>>>>>   the licensing issue was discovered and so I held off on the release
of
>>>>>   Trinidad 2.0.1 until we could get these addressed and things had
>>>> stabilized.
>>>>>    It looks like they have a bit so I'm thinking the trunk would make
a
>>>> good
>>>>>   2.0.1 release rather then what is currently in the tag.
>>>>>
>>>>>   3. I'd like the change the trunk to become Trinidad 2.1.0 to reflect
>>>> our
>>>>>   Faces 2.1 work.  JSF 2.1 will be the bottom dependency for that branch.
>>>>   The
>>>>>   current 2.0.x branch would be moved to the branches for further bug
fixing
>>>>>   and stuff (much like we did with 2.0 and 1.2).
>>>>>
>>>>>   Please respond to this over the next day or so, so that I can get a
feel
>>>> for
>>>>>   what the community believes is best.  :)
>>>>>
>>>>>   Scott
>>>>>
>


Mime
View raw message