Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ADF467E44 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 09:00:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2205 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2011 09:00:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 2172 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2011 09:00:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "MyFaces Development" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 2165 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2011 09:00:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 09:00:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [217.146.176.179] (HELO nm24-vm5.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com) (217.146.176.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 09:00:04 +0000 Received: from [217.146.183.216] by nm24.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Oct 2011 08:59:43 -0000 Received: from [217.146.183.42] by tm9.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Oct 2011 08:59:43 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1027.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Oct 2011 08:59:43 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 266149.68842.bm@omp1027.mail.ukl.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 47613 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Oct 2011 08:59:43 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.de; s=s1024; t=1319792383; bh=rZuPy9xdwNZjXU/YxX3vJfJuwOndXYkKnu6t+xkHjec=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=yXkeHHfMXURxoLWGiiNfQ3r2KhnbAxCJFjD9lTsCmKQFjmJRZykjXP07W3DjOjACRA6sV/74gOSUUC+XmOstR8KRzAOSomeV6YO/StnQGNm6x5HWFBRKHHnejQQBC0FF34DU/htGocCm6usfCuOt8AMQrgGnDIUj/lt6lVnOLLk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.de; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=wacfurb7hQh+KwPxsAgJH8iQctfRLfGRMLGQCMVMUZMLtpkcy44XdAzR9nbkSeB6xJh1X4JA5zq39GR1ycv1h8ahHCUlGzMjnTAwIp6BBp5YtNojjKR0ahC9+ubGEY457TIYvn/uFEYKZSrl02qM+V2eh/ndwn09cY7mz1gUnKs=; X-YMail-OSG: Tp10uN8VM1n6QfRS_nJ3Y1YKaRqcvwRr1RyjYphuuj9wD7. jQM_V1.lw Received: from [80.108.122.184] by web27802.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 09:59:42 BST X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.114.317681 References: <1319631539.99211.YahooMailNeo@web27805.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <1319790456.37436.YahooMailNeo@web27807.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1319792382.39802.YahooMailNeo@web27802.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 09:59:42 +0100 (BST) From: Mark Struberg Reply-To: Mark Struberg Subject: Re: [VOTE] extend maximum allowed line length from 120 to 160 To: MyFaces Development In-Reply-To: <1319790456.37436.YahooMailNeo@web27807.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Volker, =0A=0AI already fixed 1111 issues in myfaces-core-api and about = another 1000 in myfaces-core-impl (not only line-length).=0AWe had a lot li= nes which even exceeded the 160 chars, but I was really tired already and r= elaxed my own local checkstyle rules to 160 chars now. =0A=0ABut since you = are a MyFaces Committer (even PMC) too, I'm perfectly =0Afine with 120 if y= ou could volunteer and fix another 600 checkstyle issues =0Abecause of that= - thanks a lot in advance!=0A=0AIt's pretty easy. Just go to myfaces/core/= impl and run=0A=0A$:> mvn checkstyle:check -Pcheckstyle=0A=0Ayou then get a= ll the checkstyle errors in a file=0A=0A$:> less target/checkstyle-results.= xml=0A=0Ajust search for 'error'.=0A=0Atxs again and LieGrue,=0Astrub=0A=0A= =0A=0A----- Original Message -----=0A> From: Mark Struberg =0A> To: myfaces-dev =0A> Cc: =0A> Sent: Friday,= October 28, 2011 10:27 AM=0A> Subject: Re: [VOTE] extend maximum allowed l= ine length from 120 to 160=0A> =0A> Volker, source code is no newspaper.=0A= > =0A> Imo 80 chars is definitely fine for C or perl with cryptic syntax (p= rogrammed =0A> that myself for 20 years) but it's not nice for languages wh= ere descriptive =0A> variable and method names are 'socially accepted' ;)= =0A> =0A> =0A> LieGrue,=0A> strub=0A> =0A> =0A> =0A> ----- Original Message= -----=0A>> From: Volker Weber =0A>> To: MyFaces Devel= opment ; Mark Struberg =0A> =0A>= > Cc: =0A>> Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 9:22 AM=0A>> Subject: Re: [VO= TE] extend maximum allowed line length from 120 to 160=0A>> =0A>> Hi,=0A>>= =0A>> -1.=0A>> =0A>> In my opinion 160 characters is much to wide, the c= urrent 120 is not=0A>> the preferred, but the allowed max width.=0A>> I v= ote for 80 characters as preferred max width.=0A>> =0A>> In general readin= g is easier if the text is not too wide, thats why=0A>> newspaper articles= are layouted in columns.=0A>> =0A>> =0A>> Regards,=0A>> =A0 =A0 Volker= =0A>> =0A>> 2011/10/26 Mark Struberg :=0A>>> =A0 Hi!=0A= >>> =0A>>> =A0 Currently we have really long and very descriptive variable = names in =0A>> MyFaces.=0A>>> =0A>>> =A0 I personally like that, but due t= o that we are really often exceeding =0A> the =0A>> 120 character per line= .=0A>>> =0A>>> =A0 Thus my question: should we extend this from 120 to 160 = characters =0A> being =0A>> allowed per line?=0A>>> =0A>>> =A0 [+1] yup ma= ke 160 the max default=0A>>> =A0 [0] don't care=0A>>> =A0 [-1] nope, let's = stick with 120=0A>>> =0A>>> =A0 open for 72h ...=0A>>> =0A>>> =0A>>> =A0 Pl= ease make use of your vote, because I will activate the checkstyle =0A> che= cks =0A>> soon ;)=0A>>> =0A>>> =A0 here is my +1.=0A>>> =0A>>> =A0 LieGrue= ,=0A>>> =A0 strub=0A>>> =0A>>> =0A>> =0A>> =0A>> =0A>> -- =0A>> inexso - = information exchange solutions GmbH=0A>> Ofener Str. 30 =A0 =A0 =A0| 26121= Oldenburg=0A>> Tel.: +49 441 219 730 56 |=0A>> FAX: =A0+49 441 219 730 6= 6 | eMail: volker.weber@inexso.de=0A>> =0A>> Firmensitz: Oldenburg | Amtsg= ericht Oldenburg HRB 205251=0A>> Gesch=E4ftsf=FChrer: Stefan Schulte, Mich= ael Tersch=FCren=0A>> =0A>