Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 70AF69695 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 13:53:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6163 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2011 13:53:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 6095 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2011 13:53:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "MyFaces Development" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 6075 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2011 13:53:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 13:53:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [217.146.183.242] (HELO nm10-vm0.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com) (217.146.183.242) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 13:53:34 +0000 Received: from [217.146.183.211] by nm10.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Oct 2011 13:53:13 -0000 Received: from [217.146.183.172] by tm4.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Oct 2011 13:53:13 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1013.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Oct 2011 13:53:13 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 929956.30443.bm@omp1013.mail.ukl.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 12268 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Oct 2011 13:53:13 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.de; s=s1024; t=1319723593; bh=etV9dGgtZl+wPylLFrimSVQDzEgN29NcQO0D4GVGnBc=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QG9wXozPwwIGE0cKB0cc+Gvruri5QQwy+/gv5FXRuhUKSclPV6J0KO//VUDelVJE9+oCa6+0TfnN8x++tY81KlvYOZ9GNh2hkMm7WB0SH8ajs3ObyPYWMb/Xzl+udko8Pghn722aeTe63siIs1TKJYLC1FJj0Mbo0wNW+J+QFT8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.de; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=VN3acXEywfPRl00BGQRpJZblAPVg4spMs97x1Ka+UMoEDVuQ64FuKgALmlnEatcoypeqNNpmIo8x2hpQk8gh8hp2/qZs5wNnnvBQuDeSLDWVX3PZc3Ft8o0QWCwIcxW7zPpmgho/Bv9Scbzh0XAaZpm7CT5S7tvPzLbBjnhSUuo=; X-YMail-OSG: 9nHLStwVM1kJ1IR5hbaEs5cff2rTEqZJqpP2moTyD5M0wuJ 2DigwerL6SZwzc51Y9OEkGxsBgjFRKBGHzOnrvUOUmd1tY7KEUOLM5BRwT6O Q3Qk6agH3tRQGEwc2uHshdyA.xTl2rUr5mlZDQEwvaWn6gbrwTcnR2hyI9Vz fc2qdY8B23_hLeXV_Dh5U4jUQyQk9ZFGEebbuLRYZOGy.eCuUrSI3bIpm9sb kefKV.yUcDVPXOvPDZYU99oLYPcHwn25tVpblzsXNWfurLlurdkLeUre6x4. aoAGHlB371VzZitlczKlGAc4JmSkAn5WoWkFasZ4p5NsXjC7cZNFk97OjLNH kejPGrIFTACzgZZH8iVumGSOClvGfChuuYrjoFdDCBgcNbAlKJI1lMeNjO46 hKSctcj8e.G33 Received: from [80.108.122.184] by web27807.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:53:13 BST X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.114.317681 Message-ID: <1319723593.11255.YahooMailNeo@web27807.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:53:13 +0100 (BST) From: Mark Struberg Reply-To: Mark Struberg Subject: StateHolder#isTransient equals and hashCode question To: myfaces-dev MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi! we have lots of classes which implement equals but no hashCode() - this is bad. e.g. DoubleRangeValidator has an equals but doesn't include _transient in it's comparison. Is this ok? LieGrue, strub