myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [trinidad] cleanup
Date Wed, 05 Oct 2011 11:28:18 GMT
some implementations of old apis are already delegating to the corresponding
jsf2 apis.
however, there are still even >pre< jsf >1.x< classes in the impl. module.

imo we should think about a special backward compatibility module as an
alternative.

regards,
gerhard

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces



2011/10/5 Scott O'Bryan <darkarena@gmail.com>

> Well just because something is depth aged doesn't mean we can remove it.
>  It just means that an alternate means is suggested or something may not
> work exactly as expected if used.
>
> A Prime example is ExternalContextUtils.  That guy has been around since
> JSF 1.1.  It contains lots of functionality that wasn't present in later
> versions of JSF, but now is.  Use of the native objects should be
> encouraged, but there is also something to be said about older code being
> able to migrate easier to a later release.
>
> Now I DO agree with removing the JSDoc and possibly the deprecations in the
> impl, but I think it's important to keep any deprecations in the API for
> backward compatibility.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Oct 5, 2011, at 4:32 AM, Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> both - there are just two possibilities: those parts are really deprecated
> and we remove them (and refactor the rest) or we can't remove them and the
> information (annotation and/or javadoc) isn't correct.
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
> <http://www.irian.at>http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
>
>
> 2011/10/5 Scott O'Bryan < <darkarena@gmail.com>darkarena@gmail.com>
>
>> Gerhard, by deprivation hints, I'm assuming you mean the javadoc
>> deprecations and not the annotations, right?
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Oct 5, 2011, at 3:09 AM, Gerhard Petracek <<gerhard.petracek@gmail.com>
>> gerhard.petracek@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> hi @ all,
>>
>> there are still over 400 deprecations (via @Deprecated) and nearly 400 via
>> javadoc (not all of them overlap).
>> a lot of them are in for a long time and some of them were deprecated even
>> before [1].
>>
>> however, some parts are still used and can't be removed.
>>
>> imo we should do a cleanup or remove the deprecation hints.
>>
>> regards,
>> gerhard
>>
>> [1]  <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1229><https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1229>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1229
>>
>> <http://www.irian.at> <http://www.irian.at>http://www.irian.at
>>
>> Your JSF powerhouse -
>> JSF Consulting, Development and
>> Courses in English and German
>>
>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message