myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: MyFaces in OSGi environment
Date Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:23:45 GMT
hi kamil,

imo it would be useful, if you provide an overview of the most important
parts.
(fyi: we can't change APIs in the package javax.faces.*)

regards,
gerhard

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces



2011/7/26 Kamil Soboń <iso.poczta@gmail.com>

> How detailed our proposal should be ? We should point every place that we
> consider to be changed ? Or it will be enough to write in detailed way, what
> we wanted to solve, what we have done and where are the problems ?
>
> Pozdrawiam,
> Kamil Soboń
>
> iso.poczta(at)gmail.com
> sobon(at)student.agh.edu.pl
>
> Dnia 26-07-2011 o godz. 19:43 Mike Kienenberger <mkienenb@gmail.com>
> napisał(a):
>
> > This is the right place for your questions and proposals.
> >
> > We cannot tell you anything further until we see the proposals and
> details.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Kamil Soboń <iso.poczta@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Me and my friend are trying to create modular web application that will
> work
> >> in OSGi environment.
> >> We have chosen JSF (MyFaces implementation) for our web tier (In fact we
> >> have chosen this technology in first version of our application, where
> we
> >> have implemented own mechanism for plug-in management, now we want to
> use
> >> OSGi).
> >>
> >> We have few very important assumption for web tier: views (pages),
> resources
> >> and manageable beans can be provided, changed and taken away in
> run-time.
> >> This is a result of other assumption: our application should be
> modularized
> >> in plug-ins that can be installed, updated or uninstalled in run-time.
> >> There are few problems with MyFaces that we were trying to omit. Some we
> >> have managed to, some partially and some not. I am not going to tell
> about
> >> the details, but I can tell about them or provide web site urls where we
> >> have written down our cogitations.
> >>
> >> After some time we have reached a conclusion that it is pointless to
> make
> >> MyFaces working as we want to, without changing things in core
> >> implementation. Generally we know what should be reimplemented or
> redesigned
> >> in core implementation of MyFaces. We believe that some of changes
> should be
> >> done in API to make MyFaces more flexible. Once more I am not going to
> tell
> >> about the details here (but fell free to ask).
> >>
> >> My questions are
> >> Is it our proposal worth of consideration ? Maybe out assumptions break
> down
> >> some JavaServer Faces assumption and this technology cannot be used in
> such
> >> application ?
> >> Is it right place to ask about changes in MyFaces ?
> >> Can you/we make such changes in core implementation, or maybe MyFaces is
> >> simply implementation of JSF specification ? If it is, should we turn to
> >> people that are responsible for JSF specification ?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Pozdrawiam,
> >> Kamil Soboń
> >>
> >> iso.poczta(at)gmail.comturn to
> >> sobon(at)student.agh.edu.pl
> >>
> >>
>

Mime
View raw message