Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 58722 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2011 09:33:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Mar 2011 09:33:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 32447 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2011 09:33:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 32389 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2011 09:33:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "MyFaces Development" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 32382 invoked by uid 99); 18 Mar 2011 09:33:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 09:33:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bernd.bohmann@googlemail.com designates 209.85.220.181 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.181] (HELO mail-vx0-f181.google.com) (209.85.220.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 09:33:50 +0000 Received: by vxb39 with SMTP id 39so3584915vxb.12 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 02:33:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=bCRgTfmJFAsl7c8PJdZEYpiCBTIT5msMp670pmYpzaI=; b=TcQMPv0tWl5IXbpAyLntr5fjT80cZQLjdP+MrNHpH/v62tWnW5PZzI0+0EUIwpm1cL gGu6V6U9O+HVn/SO75Bwyf+uGMwlPG3xWPDIv+USUNtdcYDAtFAaRPJueejGVUS458KE BeOVNe1dmZIxidFXx4xwwCMwkSimP+/GEEc7c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=FkZzyqboOEhzoGNyyXndHpBhmc8M4/W6vk24eT0A0EbnEzTWdT5R52vhRH1n3gD2qV qqqtIPq3BMcYoFLGpxxyht9/9MPzlmJzVKSHZpByUvYKE8aen/APkqGsiDJsIX1VIPy0 /7wlkuJmmft0cen+mSrgOqH501i1YLADb/X5o= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.66.135 with SMTP id f7mr1193127vdt.198.1300440809661; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 02:33:29 -0700 (PDT) Sender: bernd.bohmann@googlemail.com Received: by 10.52.169.130 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 02:33:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4D823DB1.4020909@oracle.com> References: <4D7812D6.7070102@oracle.com> <4069770109428519791@unknownmsgid> <4D7F9434.7060301@oracle.com> <4D81199D.7090401@oracle.com> <4D823DB1.4020909@oracle.com> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 10:33:29 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ltH_7jqeFWv4Jo639mZoVgBLobI Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 3.0.0 From: Bernd Bohmann To: MyFaces Development Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello Michael, i performed a checkout of http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/portlet-bridge/core/tags/3.0.0-alph= a/ and I found many files without a license header. Regards Bernd On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Michael Freedman wrote: > Reminder -- if you are intending to vote please do so by mid-day Friday > (PST) as I want to close the vote before the weekend. > =A0=A0=A0 -Mike- > > On 3/16/2011 1:12 PM, Michael Freedman wrote: > > +1 > > FYI ... I plan to close the vote on Friday.=A0 Hopefully I will have some= more > votes to record by then. > =A0=A0 -Mike- > > On 3/15/2011 9:30 AM, Michael Freedman wrote: > > Here is the information you want -- however I don't really want to hold t= his > release until MyFaces/Trinidad are released -- rather can't we use this > release as pressure to wrap up releases in these other projects so they > follow shortly? > > Have folks been waiting to vote because of Scott's e-mail -- if so I woul= d > appreciate your vote so I can close/release this. > > Trinidad JIRA: > =A0TRINIDAD-1996 (Status Fixed 1/26/11)=A0 I believe this fix is in Beta-= 2 but I > haven't tried it yet and another member of the team reports other problem= s > with using beta-2.=A0 I need to investigate more.... > > MyFaces JIRA: > > MYFACES-3064: Fixed 3/1/11=A0 Fix Version: 2.0.5-SNAPSHOT > MYFACES-3045: Fixed 3/1/11=A0 Fix Version: 2.0.5-SNAPSHOT > MYFACES-3042: Fixed 2/15/11=A0 Fix Version: Unresolved -- patch available > MYFACES-3039: Fixed 2/18/11=A0 Fix Version: 2.0.5-SNAPSHOT > MYFACES-3038: Fixed 2/18/11=A0 Fix Version: 2.0.4 > MYFACES-3017: Fixed 2/9/11=A0 Fix Version: 2.0.4 > > > > > > > MyFacesJIRA: > > On 3/10/2011 5:50 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: > > Hey Mike, do we have JIRA tickets for the Trinidad patches needed? > > Also, what are the challenges with the MyFaces core? I, for one, > would like to see this fixed ASAP.. > > On Mar 9, 2011, at 4:53 PM, Michael Freedman > wrote: > > Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge 3.0.0-alpha= . > This is the alpha version of the Portlet Bridge for JSF 2.0. It includes > all the base function of JSR329 updated to run in a JSF 2.0 environment. > Some, though not all JSF 2.0 features are expressed/utilized. Most > significant is Ajax support and Composite Component suppport. Note: thi= s > version of the bridge will not work with any currently released versions = of > MyFaces (try Trunk) and only mostly runs on released version of Mojarra > (patches available). Likewise a patched version of Trinidad is needed to > run the TCK (for those tests that depend on Trinidad). > > Distributable components can be inspected in > http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge/3.0.0-alpha > > Repository artifacts are at: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-006/ > > > I have verified that the distributable jars run and pass the updated vers= ion > of the JSR 329 TCK. In addition I have verified that the distributable > examples run (on apache tomcat/pluto). > > ------------------------------------------------ > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, > and why.............. > > Thanks, > -Mike- >