Mailing-List: contact dev-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "MyFaces Development" <dev@myfaces.apache.org>
Message-ID: <13557800.238241296132104905.JavaMail.jira@thor>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 07:41:44 -0500 (EST)
From: "Rudy De Busscher (JIRA)" <dev@myfaces.apache.org>
To: dev@myfaces.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (EXTVAL-124) The message for 'source' target is
 not correct in the case of DateIsType.same
In-Reply-To: <12357486.238111296131870345.JavaMail.jira@thor>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EXTVAL-124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12987532#action_12987532 ] 

Rudy De Busscher commented on EXTVAL-124:
-----------------------------------------

For the source component, the  {0} is the label of the source field itself (which isn't very helpful).  Should behave the same as in the case of the MessageTarget.target where we see the other date value that is used to compare with.

> The message for 'source' target is not correct in the case of DateIsType.same 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: EXTVAL-124
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EXTVAL-124
>             Project: MyFaces Extensions Validator
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Property Validation
>    Affects Versions: 1.2.4, 2.0.4
>            Reporter: Rudy De Busscher
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Using a validation annotation like this:
> @DateIs(type = DateIsType.same, valueOf = "endDate", validationErrorMsgTarget = MessageTarget.source)
> results in an error message that contains the text 'before'
> Date has to be before {0}

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.